From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:05:31 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock. In-Reply-To: <7A436F7769CA33409C6B44B358BFFF0C0115F502F7@dlee02.ent.ti.com> References: <1245356024-2138-1-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <1245356024-2138-2-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <20090620171900.GA19715@game.jcrosoft.org> <7A436F7769CA33409C6B44B358BFFF0C0115F502F7@dlee02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <4A3DA37B.7040606@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Menon, Nishanth wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagnioj at jcrosoft.com] >> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:19 PM >> To: Tom Rix >> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Menon, Nishanth; dirk.behme at googlemail.com >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock. >> I'll add a mandatory condition >> this code MUST be test on omap2 too >> >> I think the TI's dev could help on this >> > Would have been great if we had functional omap2 support in mainline - 2420/2430.. I don't even have one of those boards around :( > > There is the omap2420h4. From the git log, it looks like it was active in 2004-2005. I do not have one. If someone wants to send one to me, I will be happy to test the i2c patch. The i2c init came from the kernel, it looked like that same init code was used for 24xx and 34xx. I do not believe there will be any problems but if there were, they should be able to dealt with in the board config file by overriding the #defines the init code uses. Tom > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > >