From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Jackson Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:27:07 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix In-Reply-To: <4A3F4558.7010707@denx.de> References: <4A37942A.20607@mimc.co.uk> <20090621142847.GI22845@game.jcrosoft.org> <4A3F3C2D.4020608@mimc.co.uk> <4A3F4558.7010707@denx.de> Message-ID: <4A3FA2CB.6040402@mimc.co.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Mark Jackson wrote: >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > ... >>> does not apply >> Sorry ... does that mean the patch fails in some way, or that this patch is >> not relevant ? > > ag at wker:~/git/u-boot$ patch -p1 --dry-run < ~/devel/u-boot-video/\[U-Boot\]\ \[PATCH\]\ Atmel\ LCD\ driver\ GUARDTIME\ fix.eml > patching file drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 42. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 70. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 151. > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c.rej > > please rebase on top of u-boot/master branch. TIA. Hmmm ... this is strange. The patch *is* based on the latest gut master !! I mailed the patch to both u-boot at lists.denx.de and u-boot at avr32linux.org mailing lists (the same email, I just added both ml address in the To: box) Looking at mail that came in on the u-boot ML, I can see that an space at the start of most of the patch lines ... argh !! The patch itself works fine ... it looks like one of the mail servers has mangled my patch. I'll try it again ... and CC you all in. Regards Mark