From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 pandora: update pin mux for rev3 boards
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:40:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A470262.6050207@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090627215837.GQ8587@game.jcrosoft.org>
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 19:12 Thu 25 Jun , Jason Kridner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
>> <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 14:57 Mon 08 Jun , Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>> > The update consists of following changes:
>> > - remove configuration of not connected pins, effectively
>> > leaving them in safe mode.
>> > - remove unused GPIOs, setup newly added ones.
>> > - setup pulls for various GPIOs. Disable pulls for game
>> > buttons, as they have external pulls.
>> > - SDRC CS change based on recent patch for
>> > Beagle and Overo.
>> >
>> > Old boards are no longer supported, but there was only
>> > small number of test boards made. Updated configuration
>> > is expected to be used for mass production.
>> If user have old version in possession NACK
>>
>> I believe no users who would possibly object have the old version (or any
>> version) in possession. Only the core developers ever got these boards.
>> Is the expectation to create #ifdef or some sort of auto-detection
>> (unlikely possible)?
> untill the hardware will be really not anymore use yes please
If two or three people (from the board manufacturer?) which are more
familiar with the development board situation than you say "we don't
need it" then this should be accepted. If nobody uses the older boards
any more (and this is what I understood they said: "There were only
few older boards, we know where they are and they are replaced by new
ones") then there is absolutely no reason to pollute U-Boot with
support for it. There is no need to add dead code to U-Boot.
We should trust the board maintainers somehow.
>> this kind of huge update is non bisectable so we do need to use a true
>> mux api
>> as the kernel lot's of other arch in u-boot
>>
>> Why is it not bisectable?
> because your mix cleanup, fixup and new board support
>> Do you have a "true mux api" to suggest?
> the same as the kernel one is the best for code sharing
OMAP3 pin mux in kernel is totally broken.
Best regards
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-28 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 11:57 [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 pandora: update pin mux for rev3 boards Grazvydas Ignotas
2009-06-25 21:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-26 0:12 ` Jason Kridner
2009-06-27 21:58 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-28 5:40 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-06-28 9:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-28 11:11 ` Dirk Behme
2009-06-28 11:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-28 12:17 ` Dirk Behme
2009-06-28 20:07 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2009-06-28 21:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-26 8:43 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2009-06-27 21:55 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A470262.6050207@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox