From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot-v2 and GPL license version?
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:13:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A54E1C8.5010808@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A352279A-5A53-4D89-BF55-E0DCB7FD0C54@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Sascha,
>
> You seem to be the person acting as maintainer of u-boot-v2. Do you
> have any input if u-boot-v2 would stay with GPLv2 or move to GPLv3?
>
> - k
U-Boot v2 is the usage case I had in mind in my question:
> Would U-Boot be willing to have as much GPLv2++ (GPLv3) as possible, and
> supporting a run time plug-in system to accommodate GPLv2-only modules?
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/61801/focus=62886>
RMS' opinion was that this approach could be taken WRT GPLv3 of the
U-Boot core and allow GPLv2 plug-ins, preferably via an explicit
exception. He was also OK with the concept from an ethical point of view.
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/61801/focus=62920>
If we took that approach, it would probably allow TiVoisation - maybe we
could craft the GPLv3 s/w to prevent add-on modules from TiVoing the
whole, but I think that would be difficult... if GPLv2 modules are added
and initialized at start up time, it would be pretty hard to prevent a
TiVo module from locking down the whole.
Since the primary point of going to GPLv3 is anti-TiVoism and the
primary (only?) argument against going to GPLv3 is to allow TiVoism,
from that point of view the GPLv3/GPLv2-plugin combination is a failure.[1]
Wolfgang's last word was pretty adamant about taking U-Boot to GPLv3. I
see the U-Boot v2 GPLv3/GPLv2-plugin technique as a way to take the core
to GPLv3 without "needlessly" re-writing the parts we've borrowed from
linux (in fact, it encourages borrowing from linux, which is a Good
Thing[tm]).
Best regards,
gvb
[1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_of_Kings#Accession_of_Solomon>
"Two prostitutes come to Solomon and ask him to settle an argument
between them as to who is the mother of a particular baby. Solomon asks
for a sword to cut the baby in half to be split between the two women.
When the first prostitute tells him to give the baby to the other rather
than kill it she proves herself to be the mother with her love for the
child. Solomon gives her the baby."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-08 17:48 [U-Boot] u-boot-v2 and GPL license version? Kumar Gala
2009-07-08 18:13 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2009-07-09 11:21 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-07-09 11:35 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-09 15:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-08 19:01 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A54E1C8.5010808@ge.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@ge.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox