From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v6] Make libgcc inclusion from common
 Makefile overridable by platform config file
In-Reply-To: <200907151954.46455.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1247081808-31514-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
	<200907151843.28595.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<4A5E6048.7010203@freescale.com>
	<200907151954.46455.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <4A5F4913.5030808@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i think calling raise/abort is already unreasonable for bare metal 
> applications.

So how do you propose that illegal divide operations be reported to the 
application?

What is so unreasonable about having a function to print a message and 
dump registers?

You could even make it a weak symbol that stays at NULL, so any attempt 
to call it will trap that way (assuming NULL pointers are trapped in 
U-Boot on that architecture...).

-Scott