From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:08:59 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] Pending OMAP3 patches, was: ARM Pull Request In-Reply-To: <4A695332.4070908@googlemail.com> References: <20090722223039.GG19203@game.jcrosoft.org> <20090722230458.C8B9F832E416@gemini.denx.de> <4A688DF7.2020105@googlemail.com> <20090723191505.GA9089@game.jcrosoft.org> <4A695332.4070908@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <4A69964B.7060809@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dirk Behme wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul , Dirk Behme wrote: >>> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, >>> .... >>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we >>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now? >>>> >>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for >>>> pulling? >>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches: >>> >>> 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html >> NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind > > Thanks to Wolfgang helping with this! > >>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030 >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html >> this will no go through arm but i2c tree > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html > > sounds different. > > Heiko and Jean-Christophe: Could you please clarify on this? > >>> 3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt >>> v7_flush_dcache_all >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html >> change requested > > If I understand the archives correctly, you requested a change only on > the first patch, not on the second one? > > Tom: Any news on this? > I spent some time yesterday starting the cache.S file. To verify I am going to compare, statically, the assembly produced by the c and S functions. Tom