[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

Hi Wolfgang,

this pull request need that ben send it's pull request for net first
as multiple patch depend on it

Ben do you plan to send it soon?

Please pull
The following changes since commit 462b1038738dd86f8dd70595f250ce792e90d244:
  Wolfgang Denk (1):
        Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master

Dieter Kiermaier (1):
      Kirkwood: add Marvell Kirkwood gpio driver

Heiko Schocher (2):
      arm, kirkwood: added KW_TWSI_BASE in kirkwood.h
      arm, kirkwood: added kw_gpio_set_valid() in gpio.h

Minkyu Kang (1):
      ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler

Piotr Ziecik (1):
      api: Fix broken build on ARM.

Prafulla Wadaskar (3):
      Marvell Sheevaplug Board support
      Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support
      Marvell RD6281A Board support

Simon Kagstrom (1):
      Add unaligned.h for arm

Wolfgang Denk (1):
      at91cap9adk: fix #ifdef/#endif pairing

 MAINTAINERS                                     |    6 +
 MAKEALL                                         |    3 +
 Makefile                                        |   10 +-
 api/api_platform-arm.c                          |    2 -
 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile          |   51 ++++++
 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk         |   25 +++
 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c |  141 ++++++++++++++++
 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h |   36 ++++
 board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile                  |   51 ++++++
 board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk                 |   25 +++
 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c                 |  179 ++++++++++++++++++++
 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h                 |   41 +++++
 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile               |   51 ++++++
 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk              |   25 +++
 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c           |  155 ++++++++++++++++++
 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h           |   41 +++++
 cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile                 |    1 +
 cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S                  |   36 ++++
 cpu/arm_cortexa8/start.S                        |   14 --
 drivers/gpio/Makefile                           |    1 +
 drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c                          |  151 +++++++++++++++++
 include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h            |   53 ++++++
 include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/kirkwood.h        |    1 +
 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h                     |   18 ++
 include/configs/at91cap9adk.h                   |    2 +-
 include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h               |  200 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/configs/rd6281a.h                       |  198 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/configs/sheevaplug.h                    |  195 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 28 files changed, 1694 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c
 create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h
 create mode 100644 cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c
 create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h
 create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
 create mode 100644 include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h
 create mode 100644 include/configs/rd6281a.h
 create mode 100644 include/configs/sheevaplug.h

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <20090722223039.GG19203@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> this pull request need that ben send it's pull request for net first
> as multiple patch depend on it
> 
> Ben do you plan to send it soon?
> 
> Please pull
> The following changes since commit 462b1038738dd86f8dd70595f250ce792e90d244:
>   Wolfgang Denk (1):
>         Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
> 
> Dieter Kiermaier (1):
>       Kirkwood: add Marvell Kirkwood gpio driver
> 
> Heiko Schocher (2):
>       arm, kirkwood: added KW_TWSI_BASE in kirkwood.h
>       arm, kirkwood: added kw_gpio_set_valid() in gpio.h
> 
> Minkyu Kang (1):
>       ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler
> 
> Piotr Ziecik (1):
>       api: Fix broken build on ARM.
> 
> Prafulla Wadaskar (3):
>       Marvell Sheevaplug Board support
>       Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support
>       Marvell RD6281A Board support
> 
> Simon Kagstrom (1):
>       Add unaligned.h for arm
> 
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>       at91cap9adk: fix #ifdef/#endif pairing
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                                     |    6 +
>  MAKEALL                                         |    3 +
>  Makefile                                        |   10 +-
>  api/api_platform-arm.c                          |    2 -
>  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile          |   51 ++++++
>  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk         |   25 +++
>  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c |  141 ++++++++++++++++
>  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h |   36 ++++
>  board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile                  |   51 ++++++
>  board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk                 |   25 +++
>  board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c                 |  179 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h                 |   41 +++++
>  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile               |   51 ++++++
>  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk              |   25 +++
>  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c           |  155 ++++++++++++++++++
>  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h           |   41 +++++
>  cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile                 |    1 +
>  cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S                  |   36 ++++
>  cpu/arm_cortexa8/start.S                        |   14 --
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile                           |    1 +
>  drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c                          |  151 +++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h            |   53 ++++++
>  include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/kirkwood.h        |    1 +
>  include/asm-arm/unaligned.h                     |   18 ++
>  include/configs/at91cap9adk.h                   |    2 +-
>  include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h               |  200 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/configs/rd6281a.h                       |  198 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/configs/sheevaplug.h                    |  195 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  28 files changed, 1694 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c
>  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h
>  create mode 100644 cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
>  create mode 100644 include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h
>  create mode 100644 include/configs/rd6281a.h
>  create mode 100644 include/configs/sheevaplug.h

Applied, thanks.

Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?

Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
pulling?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

> Applied, thanks.
> 
> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
> 
> Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
> pulling?
Ilya Yanok patch which need ack from Scoot and Ben

a at91rm9200 cleanup which cant wait a after rc1 as I want to test it on
rm9200ek this WE

and maybe few other fix patch we can be handle later

but I would like we include Alessandro patch and Prafulla kwimage for this
release not necessarely before rc1

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <20090722234335.GI19203@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
> > pulling?
> Ilya Yanok patch which need ack from Scoot and Ben
> 
> a at91rm9200 cleanup which cant wait a after rc1 as I want to test it on
> rm9200ek this WE
> 
> and maybe few other fix patch we can be handle later

Um... nothing else? What about all the pending OMAP3 patches?

> but I would like we include Alessandro patch and Prafulla kwimage for this
> release not necessarely before rc1

Please leave the kwimage patch for me; this is not ARM related, but
affects pretty much global code only.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for
the first time.                                   - Alfred E. Wiggam

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de 
> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:49 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
> 
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <20090722234335.GI19203@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be 
> ready for 
> > > pulling?
> > Ilya Yanok patch which need ack from Scoot and Ben
> > 
> > a at91rm9200 cleanup which cant wait a after rc1 as I want 
> to test it 
> > on rm9200ek this WE
> > 
> > and maybe few other fix patch we can be handle later
> 
> Um... nothing else? What about all the pending OMAP3 patches?
> 
> > but I would like we include Alessandro patch and Prafulla 
> kwimage for 
> > this release not necessarely before rc1
> 
> Please leave the kwimage patch for me; this is not ARM 
> related, but affects pretty much global code only.
Dear Jean,
As suggested by wolfgang,
I am re-structuring mkimage for code cleanup and to use function pointers,
so that kwbimage and any other similar support can be added seamlessly.
Hopefully I will send patches early next week.

Thanks and regards...
Prafulla . .

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> -- 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: 
> wd at denx.de A conservative is a man who believes that nothing 
> should be done for
> the first time.                                   - Alfred E. Wiggam
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> 

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de 
> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:49 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
> 
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <20090722234335.GI19203@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be 
> ready for 
> > > pulling?
> > Ilya Yanok patch which need ack from Scoot and Ben
> > 
> > a at91rm9200 cleanup which cant wait a after rc1 as I want 
> to test it 
> > on rm9200ek this WE
> > 
> > and maybe few other fix patch we can be handle later
> 
> Um... nothing else? What about all the pending OMAP3 patches?
> 
> > but I would like we include Alessandro patch and Prafulla 
> kwimage for 
> > this release not necessarely before rc1
> 
> Please leave the kwimage patch for me; this is not ARM 
> related, but affects pretty much global code only.
Dear Wolfgang

Hopefully you might have received my new patch series (posted 30 hours back)
I know it's very busy time for you.
But that's my wish to see this stuff in.
Please let me know your valued feedback so that I can help to get this stuff IN this release.

FYI: I tried to fulfill all points raised by you in earlier feedback.
Also some code reused from image.c/h for kwbimage in clean way
Though the entire resulting code will look different since there are lot changes, I tired to maintain smaller patches for easy understanding and acceptance

Regards..
Prafulla . .

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> -- 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: 
> wd at denx.de A conservative is a man who believes that nothing 
> should be done for
> the first time.                                   - Alfred E. Wiggam
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> 

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,

In message <73173D32E9439E4ABB5151606C3E19E202DE13C5DD@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> you wrote:
> 
> Hopefully you might have received my new patch series (posted 30 hours back)
> I know it's very busy time for you.

I received it, but did not have time for a thorough review yet. Sorry.

> But that's my wish to see this stuff in.
> Please let me know your valued feedback so that I can help to get this stuff IN this release.

That hould work out well. We still have sufficient time.

> FYI: I tried to fulfill all points raised by you in earlier feedback.
> Also some code reused from image.c/h for kwbimage in clean way
> Though the entire resulting code will look different since there are lot changes, I tired to maintain smaller patches for easy understanding and acceptance

Thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"...and the fully armed nuclear warheads, are, of  course,  merely  a
courtesy detail."

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd at denx.de] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:02 AM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; U-Boot; Ben Warren; 
> Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
> 
> Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
> 
> In message 
> <73173D32E9439E4ABB5151606C3E19E202DE13C5DD@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.
> com> you wrote:
> > 
> > Hopefully you might have received my new patch series 
> (posted 30 hours 
> > back) I know it's very busy time for you.
> 
> I received it, but did not have time for a thorough review yet. Sorry.
> 
> > But that's my wish to see this stuff in.
> > Please let me know your valued feedback so that I can help 
> to get this stuff IN this release.
> 
> That should work out well. We still have sufficient time.
Dear Wolfgang
Ping :-)
I do have some more updates for these patches,
I was waiting for your feedback so that I can reduce number of spins :-)

Regards..
Prafulla . .

> 
> > FYI: I tried to fulfill all points raised by you in earlier 
> feedback.
> > Also some code reused from image.c/h for kwbimage in clean 
> way Though 
> > the entire resulting code will look different since there are lot 
> > changes, I tired to maintain smaller patches for easy understanding 
> > and acceptance
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> -- 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: 
> wd at denx.de "...and the fully armed nuclear warheads, are, of  
> course,  merely  a courtesy detail."
> 

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de 
> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:35 AM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
> 
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <20090722223039.GG19203@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> > 
> > this pull request need that ben send it's pull request for 
> net first 
> > as multiple patch depend on it
> > 
> > Ben do you plan to send it soon?
> > 
> > Please pull
> > The following changes since commit 
> 462b1038738dd86f8dd70595f250ce792e90d244:
> >   Wolfgang Denk (1):
> >         Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
> > 
> > Dieter Kiermaier (1):
> >       Kirkwood: add Marvell Kirkwood gpio driver
> > 
> > Heiko Schocher (2):
> >       arm, kirkwood: added KW_TWSI_BASE in kirkwood.h
> >       arm, kirkwood: added kw_gpio_set_valid() in gpio.h
> > 
> > Minkyu Kang (1):
> >       ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler
> > 
> > Piotr Ziecik (1):
> >       api: Fix broken build on ARM.
> > 
> > Prafulla Wadaskar (3):
> >       Marvell Sheevaplug Board support
> >       Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support
> >       Marvell RD6281A Board support
> > 
> > Simon Kagstrom (1):
> >       Add unaligned.h for arm
> > 
> > Wolfgang Denk (1):
> >       at91cap9adk: fix #ifdef/#endif pairing
> > 
> >  MAINTAINERS                                     |    6 +
> >  MAKEALL                                         |    3 +
> >  Makefile                                        |   10 +-
> >  api/api_platform-arm.c                          |    2 -
> >  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile          |   51 ++++++
> >  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk         |   25 +++
> >  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c |  141 
> ++++++++++++++++
> >  board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h |   36 ++++
> >  board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile                  |   51 ++++++
> >  board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk                 |   25 +++
> >  board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c                 |  179 
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h                 |   41 +++++
> >  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile               |   51 ++++++
> >  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk              |   25 +++
> >  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c           |  155 
> ++++++++++++++++++
> >  board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h           |   41 +++++
> >  cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile                 |    1 +
> >  cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S                  |   36 ++++
> >  cpu/arm_cortexa8/start.S                        |   14 --
> >  drivers/gpio/Makefile                           |    1 +
> >  drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c                          |  151 
> +++++++++++++++++
> >  include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h            |   53 ++++++
> >  include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/kirkwood.h        |    1 +
> >  include/asm-arm/unaligned.h                     |   18 ++
> >  include/configs/at91cap9adk.h                   |    2 +-
> >  include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h               |  200 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/configs/rd6281a.h                       |  198 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/configs/sheevaplug.h                    |  195 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  28 files changed, 1694 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)  create mode 
> > 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/config.mk
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/rd6281a/Makefile  create 
> mode 100644 
> > board/Marvell/rd6281a/config.mk  create mode 100644 
> > board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.c  create mode 100644 
> > board/Marvell/rd6281a/rd6281a.h  create mode 100644 
> > board/Marvell/sheevaplug/Makefile  create mode 100644 
> > board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.c
> >  create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/sheevaplug.h
> >  create mode 100644 cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S  create 
> mode 100644 
> > drivers/gpio/kw_gpio.c  create mode 100644 
> > include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h  create mode 100644 
> > include/configs/mv88f6281gtw_ge.h  create mode 100644 
> > include/configs/rd6281a.h  create mode 100644 
> > include/configs/sheevaplug.h
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 
> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, 
> could we release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
> 
> Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be 
> ready for pulling?
Dear Wolfgang

The arm build is broken at this moment on u-boot.git/master
I have tested for kirkwood boards using nand (i.e. Sheevaplug and RD6281A)
same should be the case for other ARM boards using NAND flash.

The following patches from jean needed for successful build.
But those cannot be applied cleanly.
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=5b30fe639c3ca0141d78820be74ce26120056116
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=009130ac00f4679516c6bb5a20f9a97eec98e6bc

Hi Jean,
Can you please rework and include those in this release?

More references:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055591.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055064.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055469.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056085.html

Regards..
Prafulla . .

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: 
> wd at denx.de f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> 

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,

In message <73173D32E9439E4ABB5151606C3E19E202DE13BC56@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> you wrote:
> 
> The arm build is broken at this moment on u-boot.git/master
> I have tested for kirkwood boards using nand (i.e. Sheevaplug and RD6281A)
> same should be the case for other ARM boards using NAND flash.
> 
> The following patches from jean needed for successful build.
> But those cannot be applied cleanly.
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=5b30fe639c3ca0141d78820be74ce26120056116
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=009130ac00f4679516c6bb5a20f9a97eec98e6bc

These have been rejected and will NOT make it into mainline.

I will post a different solution soon.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The optimum committee has no members.
                                                   - Norman Augustine

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Dirk Behme]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
....
> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
> 
> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
> pulling?

My list of pending OMAP3 patches:

1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html

2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html

3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt v7_flush_dcache_all
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html

-> Older patch applied, but this is still expected to be applied

4. PATCH: (Updated) Fix examples for OMAP3 boards...
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056270.html

Best regards

Dirk

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> ....
> >Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
> >release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
> >
> >Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
> >pulling?
> 
> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
> 
> 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind

> 
> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
this will no go through arm but i2c tree
> 
> 3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt v7_flush_dcache_all
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html
change requested

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <20090723191505.GA9089@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
> > 
> > 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
> NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind

Sorry if I have to ask, but I mostly lost track of the discussion. It
seems you reject these patches just because you dislike the naming of
some file-local data structures and variables?

We don't have any such requirements on local names; I just re-read
"Chapter 4: Naming" of the "CodingStyle", and cannot find any such
restrictions or even hints either.

So if this is the only reason for your reject, I would like to ask
you to reconsider.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
8 Catfish                                               = 1 Octo-puss

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 22:14 Thu 23 Jul     , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <20090723191505.GA9089@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
> > > 
> > > 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
> > NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind
> 
> Sorry if I have to ask, but I mostly lost track of the discussion. It
> seems you reject these patches just because you dislike the naming of
> some file-local data structures and variables?
not because I do not like it because there are not safe and must be omap3
specific and not generic for soc specific struct

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <20090723202252.GA9480@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > Sorry if I have to ask, but I mostly lost track of the discussion. It
> > seems you reject these patches just because you dislike the naming of
> > some file-local data structures and variables?
> not because I do not like it because there are not safe and must be omap3
> specific and not generic for soc specific struct

We don't make any such restrictions in other, similar  header  files.
Adding  (artifical)  prefixes like omap3_ as you requested just makes
it more likely thatthe some declarations and code  will  be  repeated
elsewhere, just with a different name.

If you have a specific example, where you see existing or even likely
name conflicts, then please show it.  Otherwise  I  suggest  we  just
leave the code as is.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Every program has at least one bug and can be shortened by  at  least
one  instruction  --  from  which,  by induction, one can deduce that
every program can be reduced to one instruction which doesn't work.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 22:42 Thu 23 Jul     , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <20090723202252.GA9480@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry if I have to ask, but I mostly lost track of the discussion. It
> > > seems you reject these patches just because you dislike the naming of
> > > some file-local data structures and variables?
> > not because I do not like it because there are not safe and must be omap3
> > specific and not generic for soc specific struct
> 
> We don't make any such restrictions in other, similar  header  files.
> Adding  (artifical)  prefixes like omap3_ as you requested just makes
> it more likely thatthe some declarations and code  will  be  repeated
> elsewhere, just with a different name.
> 
> If you have a specific example, where you see existing or even likely
> name conflicts, then please show it.  Otherwise  I  suggest  we  just
> leave the code as is.
yes I have as we prepapre a gpio generic api for our need, which we will push
Mainline we must not make omap3 so generic
we face the same problem with last stdio cleanup

so for this patch series is not an improvment but a regression

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Jean-Christophe,

In message <20090727195648.GB5259@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > If you have a specific example, where you see existing or even likely
> > name conflicts, then please show it.  Otherwise  I  suggest  we  just
> > leave the code as is.
> yes I have as we prepapre a gpio generic api for our need, which we will push
> Mainline we must not make omap3 so generic
> we face the same problem with last stdio cleanup

Well, the simple rule is The early bird catches the worm.

You are referring to some code that nobody of us has ever seen yet,
and which therefor is of absolutely no relevance here. We don't even
know when it might be posted - next release? next year? - or if it
has any chances of being accepted for mainline.

On the other hand, we have a patch that has been posted while the
merge window was open, and that does not violate any of the rules we
normally apply when reviewing patches.

The argument that it might cause naming conflicts with a potential
patch that might be posted at some indeterminate future point of time
is definitely not a reason for rejecting the patch.


Please clearly separate your roles as a developer and a custodian: the
custodian Jean-Christophe is supposed to work based on real, existing
patches. The custodian Jean-Christophe knows about the work of the
developer Jean-Christophe only as much as anybody else - what has been
posted on the mailing list.


I understand your situation - it's a pain if you have to rework a
patch and if it's amount is growing, but that's the same fate any
other developer is facing who doesn't get his stuff ready for the
next merge window.


If this is your only concern about this patch I ask you to accept it.
The poster is not supposed to suffer from this situation.  Thanks.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A meeting is an event at which the minutes are kept and the hours are
lost.

[U-Boot] Pending OMAP3 patches, was: ARM Pull Request

[Dirk Behme]

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>> ....
>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
>>>
>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
>>> pulling?
>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
>>
>> 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
> NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind

Thanks to Wolfgang helping with this!

>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
> this will no go through arm but i2c tree

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html

sounds different.

Heiko and Jean-Christophe: Could you please clarify on this?

>> 3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt v7_flush_dcache_all
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html
> change requested

If I understand the archives correctly, you requested a change only on 
the first patch, not on the second one?

Tom: Any news on this?

Please note that it is still expected to be applied:

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056859.html


Jean-Christophe: Seems you missed to comment on the fourth pending 
patch (?):

4. PATCH: (Updated) Fix examples for OMAP3 boards...
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056270.html

Best regards

Dirk

[U-Boot] Pending OMAP3 patches, was: ARM Pull Request

[Tom]

Dirk Behme wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>>> ....
>>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
>>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
>>>>
>>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
>>>> pulling?
>>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
>>>
>>> 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
>> NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind
>
> Thanks to Wolfgang helping with this!
>
>>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
>> this will no go through arm but i2c tree
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html
>
> sounds different.
>
> Heiko and Jean-Christophe: Could you please clarify on this?
>
>>> 3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt 
>>> v7_flush_dcache_all
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html
>> change requested
>
> If I understand the archives correctly, you requested a change only on 
> the first patch, not on the second one?
>
> Tom: Any news on this?
>
I spent some time yesterday starting the cache.S file.
To verify I am going to compare, statically,  the assembly produced by 
the c and S functions.
Tom

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Jean-Christophe,

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>> ....
>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
>>>
>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
>>> pulling?
>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
[...]
>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
> this will no go through arm but i2c tree

Hmm.. only patch one changes i2c relevant source code files.
The rest is more arm relevant ... see, also:

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html

but if you give your Acked-by, I can pickup these patches.

bye
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 10:16 Mon 27 Jul     , Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Jean-Christophe,
> 
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
> >> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> >> ....
> >>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
> >>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
> >>>
> >>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
> >>> pulling?
> >> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
> [...]
> >> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
> > this will no go through arm but i2c tree
> 
> Hmm.. only patch one changes i2c relevant source code files.
> The rest is more arm relevant ... see, also:
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html
> 
> but if you give your Acked-by, I can pickup these patches.
I've reply here
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/057285.html

Acked-by but please add a note about the OMAP2 test plan

Best Regards,
J.

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Jean-Christophe, Tom,

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb:
> On 10:16 Mon 27 Jul     , Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Jean-Christophe,
>>
>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>>>> ....
>>>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
>>>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
>>>>> pulling?
>>>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
>> [...]
>>>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
>>> this will no go through arm but i2c tree
>> Hmm.. only patch one changes i2c relevant source code files.
>> The rest is more arm relevant ... see, also:
>>
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html
>>
>> but if you give your Acked-by, I can pickup these patches.
> I've reply here
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/057285.html
> 
> Acked-by but please add a note about the OMAP2 test plan

Applied this patchset to u-boot-i2c.git

Thanks.

bye
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany