From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:02:28 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] arm nomadik: gpio and i2c In-Reply-To: <20090728105558.B61D5832E416@gemini.denx.de> References: <4A641F7B.1000508@denx.de> <4A6EA5E0.2000803@esd.eu> <4A6ED200.3070703@denx.de> <20090728105558.B61D5832E416@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4A6EF6E4.2060407@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > in message <4A6ED200.3070703@denx.de> you wrote: >> OK, thanks, but this patch was just a fast thought, and >> as I wrote, I think, Wolfgang will not Ack this patch ... >> Wolfgang? > > Correct. If we are going to rework the Soft-I2C implementation, this > should be done for all boards (which is a pretty big action), and > probably should be done as part of the "i2c: rework multibus/multi- > adapter functionality" changes. Hmm... I don;t understand why we must rework all I2C Soft implementations. Just boards, who must/want call functions instead of direct using the I2C_XXX macros, can use this patch ... existing boards are work as they are ... but as we discussed this, this patch is not a need, because we can do this functionality also at the moment (of course with this unlovley include in the config file) If this is in future a no go (as Jean-Christophe suggested for the Kconfig support), we can then maybe switch to this proposal ... Hmm... also I don;t want to do this with the "multibus/multiadapter" rework, because this rework is for themselve a big change, which where I wouldn;t add one more big change ... so we maybe lost control, why things no longer work ... bye Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany