From: Felix Radensky <felix@embedded-sol.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Incorrect CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN on MPC85xx boards
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:44:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A910F8A.7070803@embedded-sol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15441F0C-BCE7-4490-8DB5-138E8E1359C7@kernel.crashing.org>
Hi, Kumar
I don't see any immediate problem with current FSL definitions
except they are confusing.
I think my proposal will not work on platforms like MPC8572,
MPC8536, and P2020DS where TEXT_BASE is defined as
0xeff80000 instead of 0xfff80000. Can you please explain the
reason why TEXT_BASE defined differently for these boards.
Thanks.
Felix.
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> All FSL MPC85xx boards define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN as 256K
>> although actual size of u-boot binary is 512K. XES Xpedite boards
>> seem to do
>> the right thing.
>>
>> I was wandering whether CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN for 85xx boards
>> can be defined in terms of CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE, similar to AMCC
>> boards ?
>>
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN (0xFFFFFFFF -
>> CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE + 1)
>
> I don't have any issue w/such a fix but would like to know what the
> implication is of having thing set the way we do on the FSL boards.
> Is there some bug we'd hit?
I don't think there's some bug
>
> - k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 10:49 [U-Boot] Incorrect CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN on MPC85xx boards Felix Radensky
2009-08-20 13:20 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-23 9:44 ` Felix Radensky [this message]
2009-08-24 14:52 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-24 15:10 ` Felix Radensky
2009-08-24 15:14 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-24 15:34 ` Felix Radensky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A910F8A.7070803@embedded-sol.com \
--to=felix@embedded-sol.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox