public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@pobox.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] PATCH mtd CFI flash: timeout calculation underflow if imprecise 1kHz timer: fix
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:25:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A93E666.4080404@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A925011.9080906@imagos.it>

Renato Andreola wrote:
>  From 21d84ab72266f118794233176bd356d8b1cfdf35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Renato Andreola <renato.andreola@imagos.it>
> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:05:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] drivers/mtd/cfi_flash: precision and underflow problem in tout calculation
> 
> With old configuration it could happen tout=0 if CONFIG_SYS_HZ<1000.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com> Renato Andreola <renato.andreola@imagos.it>
> ---
>   drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c |    8 +++++---
>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> index 81ac5d3..0d8fc54 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
> @@ -660,9 +660,11 @@ static int flash_status_check (flash_info_t * info, flash_sect_t sector,
>   	ulong start;
> 
>   #if CONFIG_SYS_HZ != 1000
> -	tout *= CONFIG_SYS_HZ/1000;
> -#endif
> -
> +	if ((ulong)CONFIG_SYS_HZ > 100000)
> +		tout *= (ulong)CONFIG_SYS_HZ/1000;  /* for a big HZ, avoid overflow */
> +	else
> +		tout = DIV_ROUND_UP(tout*(ulong)CONFIG_SYS_HZ, 1000);
> +#endif	
>   	/* Wait for command completion */
>   	start = get_timer (0);
>   	while (flash_is_busy (info, sector)) {

What should to be fixed first in this case, would be your CONFIG_SYS_HZ
setting, that is NIOS2? timer implementation, yeah really.  But I would
also point out that there is another case flash_status_check() doensn't
work as expected.

One of my colleagues found that with some flash device(s) (I don't
recall precisely, sorry), 'tout' would be probed to be zero.  In that
case, a workaround something like above still doesn't work.

We have not sorted out where the problem is; it might be in cfi_flash.c,
or in the flash device itself.  This is observed with v2009.03 release,
and we've been having a workaround for it for months.  I'd like to have
a look someday.

Anyway, checking to see if 'tout' is zero or not would be sometimes
worth a try, when you think cfi_flash.c doesn't work as expected.

Just for your information,

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-24  8:32 [U-Boot] PATCH mtd CFI flash: timeout calculation underflow if imprecise 1kHz timer: fix Renato Andreola
2009-08-25 13:25 ` Shinya Kuribayashi [this message]
2009-08-25 15:01   ` Renato Andreola
2009-08-25 15:39 ` Stefan Roese
2009-08-25 15:44   ` Stefan Roese
2009-11-22 21:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-11-23  8:51   ` Renato Andreola
2009-11-23 19:36     ` Wolfgang Denk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-06 16:08 Renato Andreola
2009-08-06 13:09 Renato Andreola
2009-08-06 13:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06 13:31   ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-08-06 14:19     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06 20:26 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-08-06 20:53   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06 21:01     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06 21:15     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-08-06 21:35       ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-07  8:15     ` Renato Andreola
2009-08-07  9:16       ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-07 12:14         ` Renato Andreola
2009-08-09 21:13           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06  9:49 Renato Andreola
2009-08-06 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-06 10:12 ` Alessandro Rubini
     [not found]   ` <4A7AB614.2020509@imagos.it>
2009-08-06 11:40     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-10 12:28 Renato Andreola
2009-04-13 22:09 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A93E666.4080404@pobox.com \
    --to=skuribay@pobox.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox