From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Odd value for I2C_TIMEOUT in fsl_i2c.c
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:16:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA0BEC5.3010505@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9FDF1E.4090908@freescale.com>
Hello Timur,
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Currently we define I2C_TIMEOUT like this:
>
> #define I2C_TIMEOUT (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 4)
>
> I'm seeing some I2C instability on a new board I'm working on, especially with SPD. If I change the above to
>
> #define I2C_TIMEOUT (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 2)
>
> The problems go away (or at least, so far appear to). Can someone tell me why we choose (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 4) to begin with? The way we use I2C_TIMEOUT is confusing:
>
> while (readb(&i2c_dev[i2c_bus_num]->sr) & I2C_SR_MBB) {
> if ((get_ticks() - timeval) > usec2ticks(I2C_TIMEOUT))
> return -1;
> }
>
> CONFIG_HZ is 1000, so I2C_TIMEOUT is equal to 250. However, the way it's used, 250 isn't the number of ticks per second, it's used as number of microseconds. If CONFIG_HZ is changed to 100, does that mean that we want to call usec2ticks(25)?
This seems like a Bug to me.
> I think what we should be doing is this:
>
> #define I2C_TIMEOUT 1000
>
> Surely, one millisecond is not too long of a timeout?
I think this should be Ok. Can you provide a patch?
Thanks for catching this.
bye
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 15:22 [U-Boot] Odd value for I2C_TIMEOUT in fsl_i2c.c Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 7:16 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 14:09 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 15:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 15:12 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 15:28 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-04 15:30 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 16:04 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-04 18:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:39 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 19:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 15:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:34 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 19:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 19:28 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 8:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:36 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 19:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA0BEC5.3010505@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox