From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 08:54:55 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
In-Reply-To: <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D91E07BDA@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
References: <20090904215722.828A2832E8DE@gemini.denx.de>,
	<4AA21599.1080107@googlemail.com>
	<0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D91E07BDA@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <4AA3BF2F.3080703@windriver.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> Wolfgang, Dirk,
>
> I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs.
>
>   
This means an omap/davinci split ?
u-boot-arm-omap
u-boot-arm-davinci

This is ok with me
Tom

> Thanks,
> Sandeep
> ________________________________________
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dirk Behme [dirk.behme at googlemail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:39 AM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
>
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>   
>> Texas Instruments (OMAP):     Dirk Behme?
>>                               Or are there any volunteers at TI?
>>     
>
> I really like to see someone from TI here, instead.
>
> Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be
> the best. E.g.:
>
> - While discussing the board/vendor directory change, we were unsure
> who might be the vendor of which board. Somebody from TI would know best.
>
> - While discussing the OMAP3 cache move, we were unsure what's about
> the ROM code calling and where/when this is necessary. Someone from TI
> would know best, too.
>
> - etc, etc.
>
> Best regards
>
> Dirk
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
>