From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:38:49 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
In-Reply-To: <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D91E07BDB@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
References: <20090904215722.828A2832E8DE@gemini.denx.de>,
	<4AA21599.1080107@googlemail.com>
	<0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D91E07BDA@dlee01.ent.ti.com>,
	<4AA3BF2F.3080703@windriver.com>
	<0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D91E07BDB@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <4AA3D789.6000905@windriver.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

And of course the omap / davinci repos should be sync-ed up regularly so 
they do not drift too much.

Tom

Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> Tom,
>
> This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an omap/davinci split.
>
> BTW there are SOC's which have an OMAP part number but are actually very similar to DaVinci's.
>
> Since i am quite familiar with the RBLs of all these devices and i have all the EVMs for the various
> SOC's with me i could help in maintaining the repository.
>
> Lets hope this split is OK with the others as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Sandeep
> ________________________________________
> From: Tom [Tom.Rix at windriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:54 AM
> To: Paulraj, Sandeep
> Cc: Dirk Behme; Wolfgang Denk; Kyungmin Park; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
>
> Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>   
>> Wolfgang, Dirk,
>>
>> I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs.
>>
>>
>>     
> This means an omap/davinci split ?
> u-boot-arm-omap
> u-boot-arm-davinci
>
> This is ok with me
> Tom
>
>   
>> Thanks,
>> Sandeep
>> ________________________________________
>> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dirk Behme [dirk.behme at googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:39 AM
>> To: Wolfgang Denk
>> Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
>>
>> Dear Wolfgang,
>>
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Texas Instruments (OMAP):     Dirk Behme?
>>>                               Or are there any volunteers at TI?
>>>
>>>       
>> I really like to see someone from TI here, instead.
>>
>> Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be
>> the best. E.g.:
>>
>> - While discussing the board/vendor directory change, we were unsure
>> who might be the vendor of which board. Somebody from TI would know best.
>>
>> - While discussing the OMAP3 cache move, we were unsure what's about
>> the ROM code calling and where/when this is necessary. Someone from TI
>> would know best, too.
>>
>> - etc, etc.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Dirk
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>