From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:58:21 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] mkconfig: parse top level makefile target to multiple config targets In-Reply-To: <20090908204825.BDB45832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> References: <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C3043F59F0@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> <20090904194248.43E2D832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C30447ECAF@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> <20090907101822.3497D832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C30447ECB9@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> <20090907105915.63F11832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C30447ECC6@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> <20090907123822.3F0D5832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <20090908153825.GA18061@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> <20090908174629.677E8832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <20090908202143.GA26672@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> <20090908204825.BDB45832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4AA6C56D.6030402@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Would this still be a big problem if the auto-generated defines were put >> in their own namespace (such as the CONFIG_MK_* that you suggested)? > > Probably not a big problem, and maybe not even a practical problem. > But it is still ugly, and nothing I really like. Well, yes -- the long term, less-ugly solution is kconfig. > But as it seems that nobody else cares about this, and I don;t have > any better ideas either, I guess I should not block this. Thanks. -Scott