public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Gorsulowski <Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:03:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA9F643.3000509@esd.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090910184150.EF1ED832E8DE@gemini.denx.de>

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Daniel Gorsulowski,
> 
> In message <4AA90821.1060106@esd.eu> you wrote:
>>>> -	/* arch number of MEESC-Board */
>>>> -	gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_MEESC;
>>>> +	/* initialize ET1100 Controller */
>>>> +	meesc_ethercat_hw_init();
>>> I thought we had agreed not to initialize the Ethernet hardware if it
>>> not used by U-Boot?
>>>
>> We had, but this does not initialize unused hardware. This is needed for
>> detecting hw_type and setting correct arch_number.
> 
> meesc_ethercat_hw_init() "is needed for ... setting correct
> arch_number" ??
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
Please take a look at function checkboard().
There is a call "hw_type = readb(CONFIG_ET1100_BASE);" to read the ET1100
type register. The read value is used to determine the correct arch_number.
  valid value (ET1100 present)      --> arch_number = MACH_TYPE_MEESC
  invalid value (no ET1100 present) --> arch_number = MACH_TYPE_ETHERCAN2

For accessing the ET1100 type register, it is mandatory to initialize the
memory controller. Thus, meesc_ethercat_hw_init() is needed and does not
initialize unused hardware!


Btw. the function meesc_ethercat_hw_init() is not new in this patch. I
entirely moved the function call.


Best regards,
Daniel Gorsulowski

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-09  7:15 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support Daniel Gorsulowski
2009-09-09  8:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-10 14:07   ` Daniel Gorsulowski
2009-09-10 18:41     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-11  7:03       ` Daniel Gorsulowski [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-04 12:29 Daniel Gorsulowski
2009-09-04 21:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-09-04 22:02   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-07  7:26     ` Daniel Gorsulowski
2009-09-07  7:44       ` Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-09  7:15       ` Daniel Gorsulowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AA9F643.3000509@esd.eu \
    --to=daniel.gorsulowski@esd.eu \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox