From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:46:26 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v3] s5pc1xx: support Samsung s5pc1xx SoC
In-Reply-To: <1f3430fb0909230342p33272bb1jb2bfe040c9e6dc34@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4AA8AC30.2070807@samsung.com>	
	<20090910103116.32D27832E8DE@gemini.denx.de>	
	<1f3430fb0909110306v698f60dble22ad40db7d98387@mail.gmail.com>	
	<4AB8C4A1.6010500@samsung.com> <4AB8E081.3040607@windriver.com>
	<1f3430fb0909230342p33272bb1jb2bfe040c9e6dc34@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ABA0A92.8050504@windriver.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom
> 
> 2009/9/22 Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>:
>> Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for the Samsung s5pc100 and s5pc110
>>> SoCs. The s5pc1xx SoC is an ARM Cortex A8 processor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim <riverful.kim@samsung.com>
>> Ack-ed
>> Tom
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
> 
> Thanks for review
> 
> and I have one question
> when I send next patch or commit this patch, should I add Acked-by?

Good question!
 From the way you submitted the patch, you added yourself as the
sign off line.  When you push the patch, you may add me to the
sign off.  As long as the original author gets the credit.

This is also useful so multiple re-reviews of an ack-ed patch
do not stall submission.

Tom


> 
> Thanks again
> Minkyu Kang