From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:38 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4 v3] s5pc1xx: add support SMDKC100 board
In-Reply-To: <1f3430fb0909230359n5fbc84d8i10d67bceaadd506a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4AA8AC52.4010906@samsung.com>	
	<20090910113658.2123E832E8DE@gemini.denx.de>	
	<1f3430fb0909110333n1014d7e9m1cc466909e423042@mail.gmail.com>	
	<4AB8C4BE.6060802@samsung.com> <4AB8E748.7020303@windriver.com>
	<1f3430fb0909230359n5fbc84d8i10d67bceaadd506a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ABA0F12.7030608@windriver.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom
> 
> 2009/9/23 Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>:
>> Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> Adds new board SMDKC100 that uses s5pc100 SoC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim <riverful.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---

<snip>

>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL
>>> +     /* setting SRAM */
>>> +     ldr     r0, =S5PC100_SROMC_BASE
>>> +     ldr     r1, =0x9
>>> +     str     r1, [r0]
>>> +#endif
>> Where is CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL defined ?
>> If it is not being used, the #ifndef logic should be reduced.
> 
> Kyungmin Park sent the patch that is supported onenand_ipl for s5pc1xx.
> but not yet applied onenand_ipl patch for s5pc1xx.
> When that patch is applied, we need these logic.
> If necessary, I'll delete these logic until apply the patch.
> 

If the patch already exits, it would be better if it was in this
patchset.  Can we get the onenand_ipl patch ?

Tom