From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:38:52 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] smc911x runtime detection
In-Reply-To: <20090926210923.GA21538@lixom.net>
References: <20090911204750.GA22246@lixom.net>
	<20090923145556.GA28659@lixom.net>
	<4ABDB120.1040106@googlemail.com>
	<28298466-46C0-4D8C-A5F2-3C2B88E4A8DC@lixom.net>
	<f8328f7c0909260902i16330bd3s3625408b829ef9@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090926210923.GA21538@lixom.net>
Message-ID: <4ABF249C.6000303@googlemail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Olof Johansson wrote:
> For future carrier boards, having an I2C ID EEPROM or similar on there
> might not be a bad idea.

Totally off-topic here, but just fyi: TinCanTools started with I2C ID 
EEPROM already

http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardPinMux#Expansion_boards

and I think this is agreed with Steve (Gumstix?), too. At least Steve 
was heavily involved in discussion about this ;)

Best regards

Dirk