* [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr
@ 2009-09-30 18:11 John Rigby
2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
2009-10-19 19:04 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: John Rigby @ 2009-09-30 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
New commands nand read.raw and write.raw read/write
main and oob area.
Implement previously stubbed nand biterr command.
Document the above and also the previously undocumented
read.oob and write.oob.
Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jrigby@control4.com>
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
index 158a55f..a488038 100644
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -90,6 +90,95 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int only_oob)
return 0;
}
+#define NAND_RW_RAW_READ 0
+#define NAND_RW_RAW_WRITE 1
+
+static int nand_rdwr_raw(int rdwr, nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ struct mtd_oob_ops ops = {
+ .len = nand->writesize,
+ .ooblen = nand->oobsize,
+ .mode = MTD_OOB_RAW,
+ };
+ int i;
+ int nrblocks = size / nand->writesize;
+ loff_t addr = (loff_t)(off & ~(nand->writesize - 1));
+
+ while (nrblocks--) {
+ ops.datbuf = buf;
+ /*
+ * for read oobbuf must be set, but oob data
+ * will be appended to ops.datbuf
+ * for write oobbuf is actually used
+ */
+ ops.oobbuf = buf + nand->writesize;
+ if (rdwr == NAND_RW_RAW_READ)
+ i = nand->read_oob(nand, addr, &ops);
+ else
+ i = nand->write_oob(nand, addr, &ops);
+ if (i < 0) {
+ printf("Error (%d) %s page %08lx\n", i,
+ rdwr == NAND_RW_RAW_READ ?
+ "reading" : "writing",
+ (unsigned long)addr);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ addr += nand->writesize;
+ buf += (nand->writesize + nand->oobsize);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nand_read_raw(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ return nand_rdwr_raw(NAND_RW_RAW_READ, nand, off, buf, size);
+}
+
+static int nand_write_raw(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ return nand_rdwr_raw(NAND_RW_RAW_WRITE, nand, off, buf, size);
+}
+
+static int nand_biterr(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int bit)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ u_char *buf;
+ ulong blockoff = off & ~(nand->erasesize - 1);
+ int byteoff = off & (nand->erasesize - 1);
+ nand_erase_options_t opts = {
+ .offset = blockoff,
+ .length = nand->erasesize,
+ };
+
+ buf = malloc(nand->erasesize +
+ nand->oobsize * (nand->erasesize / nand->writesize));
+ if (!buf) {
+ puts("No memory for page buffer\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+ nand_read_raw(nand, blockoff, buf, nand->erasesize);
+
+ ret = nand_erase_opts(nand, &opts);
+ if (ret) {
+ puts("Failed to erase block at %x\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ printf("toggling bit %x in byte %x in block %x %02x ->",
+ bit, byteoff, blockoff, buf[byteoff]);
+
+ buf[byteoff] ^= (1 << bit);
+
+ printf("%02x\n", buf[byteoff]);
+
+ nand_write_raw(nand, blockoff, buf, nand->erasesize);
+ free(buf);
+ return 0;
+}
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
static inline int str2long(char *p, ulong *num)
@@ -401,6 +490,13 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
ret = nand->read_oob(nand, off, &ops);
else
ret = nand->write_oob(nand, off, &ops);
+ } else if (!strcmp(s, ".raw")) {
+ if (read)
+ ret = nand_read_raw(nand, off,
+ (u_char *)addr, size);
+ else
+ ret = nand_write_raw(nand, off,
+ (u_char *)addr, size);
} else {
printf("Unknown nand command suffix '%s'.\n", s);
return 1;
@@ -437,9 +533,19 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
}
return ret;
}
-
if (strcmp(cmd, "biterr") == 0) {
- /* todo */
+ off = (ulong)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
+ i = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
+
+ int ret = nand_biterr(nand, off, i);
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ printf("byte offset 0x%08lx toggled bit %d\n",
+ (ulong) off, i);
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ printf("byte offset 0x%08lx could not toggle bit %d\n",
+ (ulong) addr, i);
+ }
return 1;
}
@@ -494,13 +600,16 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(nand, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_nand,
"nand write - addr off|partition size\n"
" read/write 'size' bytes starting at offset 'off'\n"
" to/from memory address 'addr', skipping bad blocks.\n"
+ " .oob - reads/writes oob only.\n"
+ " .raw - reads/writes both main and oob with no error\n"
+ " detection or correction\n"
"nand erase [clean] [off size] - erase 'size' bytes from\n"
" offset 'off' (entire device if not specified)\n"
"nand bad - show bad blocks\n"
"nand dump[.oob] off - dump page\n"
"nand scrub - really clean NAND erasing bad blocks (UNSAFE)\n"
"nand markbad off [...] - mark bad block(s) at offset (UNSAFE)\n"
- "nand biterr off - make a bit error at offset (UNSAFE)"
+ "nand biterr off bitno - toggle bit bitno in byte off (UNSAFE)\n"
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_LOCK_UNLOCK
"\n"
"nand lock [tight] [status]\n"
--
1.6.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr
2009-09-30 18:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr John Rigby
@ 2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
2009-09-30 21:34 ` John Rigby
2009-10-19 18:10 ` Scott Wood
2009-10-19 19:04 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom @ 2009-09-30 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
John Rigby wrote:
> New commands nand read.raw and write.raw read/write
> main and oob area.
>
> Implement previously stubbed nand biterr command.
>
> Document the above and also the previously undocumented
> read.oob and write.oob.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jrigby@control4.com>
> ---
> common/cmd_nand.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
> index 158a55f..a488038 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_nand.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,95 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int only_oob)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#define NAND_RW_RAW_READ 0
> +#define NAND_RW_RAW_WRITE 1
> +
> +static int nand_rdwr_raw(int rdwr, nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char *buf,
> + size_t size)
> +{
> + struct mtd_oob_ops ops = {
> + .len = nand->writesize,
> + .ooblen = nand->oobsize,
> + .mode = MTD_OOB_RAW,
> + };
> + int i;
> + int nrblocks = size / nand->writesize;
> + loff_t addr = (loff_t)(off & ~(nand->writesize - 1));
Silently dropping bytes.
Would it be better to require the size to be a multiple of the block size ?
Or at least warn of the dropped bytes.
> +
> + while (nrblocks--) {
> + ops.datbuf = buf;
<snip>
> }
>
> @@ -494,13 +600,16 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(nand, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_nand,
> "nand write - addr off|partition size\n"
> " read/write 'size' bytes starting at offset 'off'\n"
> " to/from memory address 'addr', skipping bad blocks.\n"
> + " .oob - reads/writes oob only.\n"
> + " .raw - reads/writes both main and oob with no error\n"
> + " detection or correction\n"
Writing the oob area directly is UNSAFE.
Having done to myself, it was a pain to undo.
You should put at least document that.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr
2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
@ 2009-09-30 21:34 ` John Rigby
2009-10-19 18:10 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: John Rigby @ 2009-09-30 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Tom,
Thanks for the comments. I'll wait a couple of days for others then
resubmit with fixes for these problems and any others that come up.
John
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com> wrote:
> John Rigby wrote:
>
>> New commands nand read.raw and write.raw read/write
>> main and oob area.
>>
>> Implement previously stubbed nand biterr command.
>>
>> Document the above and also the previously undocumented
>> read.oob and write.oob.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jrigby@control4.com>
>> ---
>> common/cmd_nand.c | 115
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
>> index 158a55f..a488038 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_nand.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,95 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int
>> only_oob)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +#define NAND_RW_RAW_READ 0
>> +#define NAND_RW_RAW_WRITE 1
>> +
>> +static int nand_rdwr_raw(int rdwr, nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char
>> *buf,
>> + size_t size)
>> +{
>> + struct mtd_oob_ops ops = {
>> + .len = nand->writesize,
>> + .ooblen = nand->oobsize,
>> + .mode = MTD_OOB_RAW,
>> + };
>> + int i;
>> + int nrblocks = size / nand->writesize;
>> + loff_t addr = (loff_t)(off & ~(nand->writesize - 1));
>>
>
> Silently dropping bytes.
> Would it be better to require the size to be a multiple of the block size ?
> Or at least warn of the dropped bytes.
>
> +
>> + while (nrblocks--) {
>> + ops.datbuf = buf;
>>
>
> <snip>
>
> }
>> @@ -494,13 +600,16 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(nand, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_nand,
>> "nand write - addr off|partition size\n"
>> " read/write 'size' bytes starting at offset 'off'\n"
>> " to/from memory address 'addr', skipping bad blocks.\n"
>> + " .oob - reads/writes oob only.\n"
>> + " .raw - reads/writes both main and oob with no error\n"
>> + " detection or correction\n"
>>
>
> Writing the oob area directly is UNSAFE.
> Having done to myself, it was a pain to undo.
> You should put at least document that.
>
> Tom
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr
2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
2009-09-30 21:34 ` John Rigby
@ 2009-10-19 18:10 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2009-10-19 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:22:09PM -0500, Tom wrote:
> John Rigby wrote:
>> @@ -494,13 +600,16 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(nand, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_nand,
>> "nand write - addr off|partition size\n"
>> " read/write 'size' bytes starting at offset 'off'\n"
>> " to/from memory address 'addr', skipping bad blocks.\n"
>> + " .oob - reads/writes oob only.\n"
>> + " .raw - reads/writes both main and oob with no error\n"
>> + " detection or correction\n"
>
> Writing the oob area directly is UNSAFE.
> Having done to myself, it was a pain to undo.
> You should put at least document that.
If we warn about oob being unsafe, the same warning should be made for
raw.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr
2009-09-30 18:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr John Rigby
2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
@ 2009-10-19 19:04 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2009-10-19 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:11:39PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> +static int nand_rdwr_raw(int rdwr, nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, u_char *buf,
> + size_t size)
Offset should be loff_t, here and elsewhere.
> +{
> + struct mtd_oob_ops ops = {
> + .len = nand->writesize,
> + .ooblen = nand->oobsize,
> + .mode = MTD_OOB_RAW,
> + };
> + int i;
> + int nrblocks = size / nand->writesize;
> + loff_t addr = (loff_t)(off & ~(nand->writesize - 1));
> +
> + while (nrblocks--) {
> + ops.datbuf = buf;
> + /*
> + * for read oobbuf must be set, but oob data
> + * will be appended to ops.datbuf
Hmm, that sounds like a bug in nand_do_read_ops().
> + * for write oobbuf is actually used
> + */
> + ops.oobbuf = buf + nand->writesize;
> + if (rdwr == NAND_RW_RAW_READ)
> + i = nand->read_oob(nand, addr, &ops);
> + else
> + i = nand->write_oob(nand, addr, &ops);
> + if (i < 0) {
> + printf("Error (%d) %s page %08lx\n", i,
> + rdwr == NAND_RW_RAW_READ ?
> + "reading" : "writing",
> + (unsigned long)addr);
Don't cast to unsigned long; cast to unsigned long long and use %llx
instead.
Change "page" to "offset"; IMHO the former implies "addr / nand->writesize".
> + buf += (nand->writesize + nand->oobsize);
Unnecessary parens.
> +static int nand_biterr(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int bit)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u_char *buf;
> + ulong blockoff = off & ~(nand->erasesize - 1);
> + int byteoff = off & (nand->erasesize - 1);
> + nand_erase_options_t opts = {
> + .offset = blockoff,
> + .length = nand->erasesize,
> + };
> +
> + buf = malloc(nand->erasesize +
> + nand->oobsize * (nand->erasesize / nand->writesize));
> + if (!buf) {
> + puts("No memory for page buffer\n");
s/page buffer/block buffer/
Also include the name of the function.
> + return 1;
> + }
> + nand_read_raw(nand, blockoff, buf, nand->erasesize);
Check whether it succeeded -- don't erase if you couldn't read the data.
> + ret = nand_erase_opts(nand, &opts);
> + if (ret) {
> + puts("Failed to erase block at %x\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + printf("toggling bit %x in byte %x in block %x %02x ->",
> + bit, byteoff, blockoff, buf[byteoff]);
> +
> + buf[byteoff] ^= (1 << bit);
Is there any way to flip a bit in the OOB using this command?
Also, unnecessary parens.
> +
> + printf("%02x\n", buf[byteoff]);
Put a space between -> and the number.
> + } else if (!strcmp(s, ".raw")) {
> + if (read)
> + ret = nand_read_raw(nand, off,
> + (u_char *)addr, size);
> + else
> + ret = nand_write_raw(nand, off,
> + (u_char *)addr, size);
Maybe just pass "!read" into nand_rdwr_raw?
> } else {
> printf("Unknown nand command suffix '%s'.\n", s);
> return 1;
> @@ -437,9 +533,19 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> return ret;
> }
> -
> if (strcmp(cmd, "biterr") == 0) {
> - /* todo */
> + off = (ulong)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> + i = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
> +
> + int ret = nand_biterr(nand, off, i);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + printf("byte offset 0x%08lx toggled bit %d\n",
> + (ulong) off, i);
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + printf("byte offset 0x%08lx could not toggle bit %d\n",
> + (ulong) addr, i);
> + }
Why "addr" on failure but "off" on success? Looks like addr is used
uninitialized.
As NAND is already on the heavy side, perhaps we should make non-core
functionality like raw accesses and bit errors be configurable?
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-19 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-30 18:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nand: Implement raw read/write and biterr John Rigby
2009-09-30 19:22 ` Tom
2009-09-30 21:34 ` John Rigby
2009-10-19 18:10 ` Scott Wood
2009-10-19 19:04 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox