From: kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk <kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:25:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC66FDE.4060502@fearnside-systems.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f3430fb0909290856t13ac907cg214873240dca4255@mail.gmail.com>
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear kevin Morfitt
>
> sorry for blank message
>
> 2009/9/30 Minkyu Kang <promsoft@gmail.com>:
>> Dear Kevin Morfitt
>>
>> 2009/9/26 kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk
>> <kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk>:
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - re-formatted patch to remove line wrapping
>>>
>>> Note that patch 2/4 of this series has not changed.
>>>
>>> This patch re-formats the code in cpu/arm920t and cpu/arm920t/23c24x0 in
>>> preparation for changes to add support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board.
>>>
>>> The changes are as follows:
>>> - re-indent the code using Lindent
>>> - make sure register layouts are defined using a C struct
>>> - replace the upper-case typedef'ed C struct names with lower case
>>> non-typedef'ed ones
>>> - make sure registers are accessed using the proper accessor functions
>>> - run checkpatch.pl and fix any error reports
>>>
>>> Note that usb_ohci.c still has two lines that exceed 80 characters. This is
>>> because the statements on those lines lose readability when wrapped - the Linux
>>> coding style guidelines allow for this.
>>>
>>> It assumes the following patch has been applied first:
>>> - [U-Boot][PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ fix for ARM902T S3C24X0 Boards, 05/09/2009
>>>
>>> Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II Board with local u-boot patches as I don't have
>>> any s3c2400 or s3c2410 boards but need this patch applying before I can submit
>>> patches for the SBC2440-II Board. Also, ran MAKEALL for all ARM9 targets and no
>>> new warnings or errors were found.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt <kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/interrupts.c | 2 +-
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/speed.c | 42 +-
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/timer.c | 74 ++-
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/usb.c | 30 +-
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/usb_ohci.c | 1268 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/usb_ohci.h | 187 +++---
>>> cpu/arm920t/start.S | 63 +-
>>> 7 files changed, 873 insertions(+), 793 deletions(-)
>>>
>
> I didn't see all of your patch.
Here are links to the patches and notes on their states:
- [U-boot] [PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ change for cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 boards:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/thread.html,
JP said it looked OK but needed testing, then it was tested by Wolfgang
- [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu/arm920t and
cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 code (this patch): one comment so far (your own)
- [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 2/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 header files:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060111.html,
no comments as yet
- [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 3/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand
driver, http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061583.html,
one comment by Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou, fixed in v2
- [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 4/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver,
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061584.html,
v1 was Acked by Scott here -
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060580.html
> But there are remained more works for cleaning
My aim is to clean up just the s3c24x0 common code so I can later add support
for the Embest SBC2440-II Board. I can see that the rest of the arm920t code
also needs cleaning but this would be a much bigger job and could be done
later - I'd rather limit these patches to s3c24x0 code.
> please use lower case name at C structure's members and functions
I think I have changed all structure names to lower case in the s3c24x0 code.
I also think I've changed all function names to lower case except where
the change would affect too many other areas - for example, if I change
get_HCLK() to get_hclk() in cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/speed.c I'd also need to
change the same in include/common.h, cpu/lh7a40x, arm920t/imx and
arm1176/s3c64xx and all functions that call get_HCLK() throughout u-boot.
Again, this does need doing but could be done later.
Regards
Kevin
>
> Thanks
> Minkyu Kang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 11:36 [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk
[not found] ` <1f3430fb0909290850tcf0dce0v265974b683459c28@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-29 15:56 ` Minkyu Kang
2009-10-02 21:25 ` kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk [this message]
2009-10-05 16:35 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye
2009-10-06 8:20 ` kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk
2009-10-09 6:07 ` Minkyu Kang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC66FDE.4060502@fearnside-systems.co.uk \
--to=kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox