[U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code

[Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye <walsimou@walsimou.com>]

kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk a ?crit :
> Here are links to the patches and notes on their states:
> - [U-boot] [PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ change for cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 boards:
>   http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/thread.html, 
>   JP said it looked OK but needed testing, then it was tested by Wolfgang
> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu/arm920t and 
>   cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 code (this patch): one comment so far (your own)
> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 2/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 header files:
>   http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060111.html, 
>   no comments as yet
> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 3/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand 
>   driver, http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061583.html,
>   one comment by Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou, fixed in v2
> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 4/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver,
>   http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061584.html,
>   v1 was Acked by Scott here - 
>   http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060580.html
>
>   
>> But there are remained more works for cleaning
>>     
>
> My aim is to clean up just the s3c24x0 common code so I can later add support 
> for the Embest SBC2440-II Board. I can see that the rest of the arm920t code 
> also needs cleaning but this would be a much bigger job and could be done 
> later - I'd rather limit these patches to s3c24x0 code. 
>
>   
>> please use lower case name at C structure's members and functions
>>     
>
> I think I have changed all structure names to lower case in the s3c24x0 code.
> I also think I've changed all function names to lower case except where
> the change would affect too many other areas - for example, if I change 
> get_HCLK() to get_hclk() in cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/speed.c I'd also need to 
> change the same in include/common.h, cpu/lh7a40x, arm920t/imx and 
> arm1176/s3c64xx and all functions that call get_HCLK() throughout u-boot. 
> Again, this does need doing but could be done later.
>   
Kevin,
As nobody seems to have an objection about your changes, I think you can 
just go ahead and make available
changes to support s3c2440 and your board.

Cheers,