From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rix Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:31:04 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-samsung/master In-Reply-To: <4AD2DCE3.5010108@samsung.com> References: <4AD2DCE3.5010108@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4AD545F8.2030708@bumblecow.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Tom, > > The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915: > Tom Rix (1): > Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91 > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master > > Minkyu Kang (5): > s5pc1xx: support Samsung s5pc1xx SoC > s5pc1xx: support onenand driver > s5pc1xx: support serial driver > s5pc1xx: add support SMDKC100 board > Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm > This is a new board. I think this board was submitted after the merge window And it has a lot of compiler warnings. Can you clean these up ? I think these should wait to be merged. > kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk (5): > CONFIG_SYS_HZ fix for ARM902T S3C24X0 Boards > Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code > Clean-up of s3c24x0 header files > Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand driver > Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver These look like a code that was run through indent. cleaning up without any obvious new features. These would be ok to merge. Does this sound ok? I can just cherry pick the cleanups. Tom