* [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one
@ 2009-10-23 21:43 Richard Retanubun
2009-10-24 6:19 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Retanubun @ 2009-10-23 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Greetings,
I am sorry if this has been asked before, It does not appear so on the mailing list archive.
I'd like to replace do_reset function with my own custom one, (i.e. resetting by not petting an external hw watchdog).
In previous discussion,
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2007-January/018848.html
Wolfgang seems to favor creating a custom-board specific command (e.g. wdreset) and calling that
but If I do that, I have to replace all instances of do_reset that matters to my board.
It seems simpler to simply 'hijack and replace/enhance' the existing 'do_reset' to do my bidding.
Is there a recommended way of doing this? Any chance of adding something like this:
/cpu/$some-cpu/cpu.c
do_reset()
{
#ifdef CUSTOM_BOARD_RESET
custom_board_reset();
#endif;
<normal do_reset command>
}
This way each board can define their own "call_custom_board" function.
Thanks for everyone's time
- Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one
2009-10-23 21:43 [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one Richard Retanubun
@ 2009-10-24 6:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-26 18:44 ` Richard Retanubun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-10-24 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Friday 23 October 2009 17:43:18 Richard Retanubun wrote:
> I am sorry if this has been asked before, It does not appear so on the
> mailing list archive.
>
> I'd like to replace do_reset function with my own custom one, (i.e.
> resetting by not petting an external hw watchdog).
>
> In previous discussion,
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2007-January/018848.html
>
> Wolfgang seems to favor creating a custom-board specific command (e.g.
> wdreset) and calling that but If I do that, I have to replace all
> instances of do_reset that matters to my board. It seems simpler to simply
> 'hijack and replace/enhance' the existing 'do_reset' to do my bidding.
>
> Is there a recommended way of doing this? Any chance of adding something
> like this:
>
> /cpu/$some-cpu/cpu.c
>
> do_reset()
> {
>
> #ifdef CUSTOM_BOARD_RESET
> custom_board_reset();
> #endif;
>
> <normal do_reset command>
> }
>
> This way each board can define their own "call_custom_board" function.
#ifdef's are the past. weaks are in!
the Blackfin port already does:
void board_reset(void) __attribute__((__weak__));
...
if (board_reset)
board_reset();
...
the bf537-stamp uses this to make sure some pins are driven low to workaround
weak pull ups in the hardware
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20091024/1e4224cf/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one
2009-10-24 6:19 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2009-10-26 18:44 ` Richard Retanubun
2009-10-26 20:50 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Retanubun @ 2009-10-26 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> #ifdef's are the past. weaks are in!
>
> the Blackfin port already does:
> void board_reset(void) __attribute__((__weak__));
> ...
> if (board_reset)
> board_reset();
> ...
>
> the bf537-stamp uses this to make sure some pins are driven low to workaround
> weak pull ups in the hardware
> -mike
Thanks for the tip Mike! I've submitted patches for MPC83xx and MCF5271 architectures.
They lack cpu.h file though, so I made one, let's see what the maintainers says.
Thanks again,
- Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one
2009-10-26 18:44 ` Richard Retanubun
@ 2009-10-26 20:50 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-10-26 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Monday 26 October 2009 14:44:28 Richard Retanubun wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > #ifdef's are the past. weaks are in!
> >
> > the Blackfin port already does:
> > void board_reset(void) __attribute__((__weak__));
> > ...
> > if (board_reset)
> > board_reset();
> > ...
> >
> > the bf537-stamp uses this to make sure some pins are driven low to
> > workaround weak pull ups in the hardware
>
> Thanks for the tip Mike! I've submitted patches for MPC83xx and MCF5271
> architectures. They lack cpu.h file though, so I made one, let's see what
> the maintainers says.
it would probably make sense to move the prototype to the common files where
do_reset() is defined ...
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20091026/326c9c34/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-26 20:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-23 21:43 [U-Boot] replacing do_reset with a custom one Richard Retanubun
2009-10-24 6:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-26 18:44 ` Richard Retanubun
2009-10-26 20:50 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox