From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Scharsig <esw@bus-elektronik.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:26:03 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM AT91 new board EB+CPUx9K2
In-Reply-To: <20091027114407.637B2E916D5@gemini.denx.de>
References: <4AE6B186.9030301@bus-elektronik.de>
	<20091027114407.637B2E916D5@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4AE7110B.7030801@bus-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> And by the way: please chose a board name that can be used
> consistently:
> 
>> +EB_CPUx9K2_config	:	unconfig
>> +	@$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) arm arm920t EB+CPUx9K2 BuS at91rm9200
> 
> If the target name is EB_CPUx9K2 (why are you shouting here?) then the
> board directory and config file names shall be based on EB_CPUx9K2, too.

It's a incomplete rename by my side. sorry.

Wath name/syntax do you prefer? eb_cpux9k2... or eb+cpux9k2...

Best regards,

Jens Scharsig