[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM AT91 new board EB+CPUx9K2

[Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
> 
> In message <4AE99F40.4000107@windriver.com> you wrote:
>>> By the way, the AT91RM9200.h. has hundreds of style problems.
>>> This requires a complete revision of the AT91RM9200.h. 
>>> I can try this, but will take a while and I can't test other
>>> RM9200 boards.
>> Please limit your changes to what you can test.
>> Tom
> 
> Pure coding style changes are easy to verify - they should lead to
> identical (except for the time stamps) images.
> 
> Also, board maintainers can and should be challenged to test such
> patches.
> 
> Please don't stop improving the code just because others need to help
> with the testing.

I was thinking that this would be converting from #define offsets to
structures. It can be easy to get these wrong.  Without testing 
as-you-go these types of bugs can be difficult to resolve.

Tom

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
>