From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:00:16 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] Best way of making some drivers common across kirkwood
 and orion5x SoCs?
In-Reply-To: <20091031152343.CCBFBC88C7@gemini.denx.de>
References: <4AEBFF60.90902@free.fr> <20091031145030.8B687C88C7@gemini.denx.de>
	<4AEC53DB.6050509@free.fr>
	<20091031152343.CCBFBC88C7@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4AECDDA0.8060203@free.fr>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> 
> In message <4AEC53DB.6050509@free.fr> you wrote:
>> Would a name such as "marvell.h" be more acceptable? This would be
> 
> Hm... I expect there will be little chance to see MAarvell IP blocks
> in non-Marvell SoCs, so this should work indeed. On the other hand,
> why not chose a name that works for other CPUs / SoCs as well. [So on
> second thought maybe your "soc.h" was not that bad a name.]
> 
> Let's see what others suggest.

While we wait for others' opinion, one quick question: do you prefer me
to submit this rework of the Marvell IP/drivers as individual patches,
one for each IP/driver, or as a single patch for the whole rework?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.