From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:50:16 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC 3/5] CAN device driver for the SJA1000 In-Reply-To: <200911021302.20662.matthias.fuchs@esd.eu> References: <1257075217-26623-1-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com> <1257075217-26623-3-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com> <1257075217-26623-4-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com> <200911021302.20662.matthias.fuchs@esd.eu> Message-ID: <4AEED588.7060903@grandegger.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Matthias Fuchs wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > this patch conflicts with my simple SJA header posted some days ago > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/063097.html > > together with a fix for two of our boards - which has not much > to do with CAN. WD asked me to use a C struct to access the SJA1000. > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062902.html > > So where does this bring us? Either we want to use C structs for everything > or decide it from patch to patch :-( Then it should be changed, of course. This patch is far from being accepted and for the moment it's an implementation detail. I'm especially interested to hear if such a generic CAN interface would serve your purposes as well, as you require access to the SJA1000 somehow. Wolfgang.