From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:39:41 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support In-Reply-To: References: <1257312932-7229-1-git-send-email-pthomas8589@gmail.com> <4AF212AF.1060007@windriver.com> Message-ID: <4AF21ECD.8000308@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Paul Thomas wrote: >> Another partition.c... >> Looking for >> >> ugrep Ulf >> ./board/ronetix/pm9263/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/ronetix/pm9261/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9rlek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91cap9adk/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/led.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/esd/meesc/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> >> Why do we need another copy? >> Please move this to arm926ejs/at91/ >> If you are feeling adventurous, move the others, else I will take >> care of it once this change is committed >> > > I think the partition.c file should stay with the board and not move > to arm926ejs/at91/. It's probably the case that most of the boards are > using the 8MB dataflash with the same partition table, but it is still > a board specific configuration. > I have looked at about half of them. It looks like partition tables are identical. The difference is more entries in the CS table. I am interested in a way to generalize this file and move it to the cpu layer so all the common or nearly common files can be reduced to 1 file Tom > thanks, > Paul