public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add I2C multibus support for OMAP2/3 boards
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:35:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF2722E.3090901@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF26FE8.8020606@denx.de>

Hi Heiko,

Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Dirk,
> 
> Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Dirk Behme wrote:
> [...]
>>>> While all above are only style questions, what's about the main
>>>> functionality topic:
>>>>
>>>> Do we have to call i2c_init() for bus 1 and 2 if switching to it? If
>>>> yes, who does it? For bus 0 it's already in the code. I'd like that the
>>>> user doesn't have to care about it. Therefore, I added
>>> I solved this in the multibus_v2 branch, see:
>>>
>>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multibus_v2
>>>
>> Looks like we have to merge that with what is in this patch somehow.
>> What are your plans with that branch? Is it intended to go into
>> mainline, soon?
> 
> I have to do some more work, before this is ready to go in mainline...
> 
>> It seems to me that multibus_v2 and this patch are somehow orthogonal
>> (but yes, they will need some merging).
> 
> Yep, I hold the multibus_v2 branch in sync with mainline.
> 
>> Regarding omap24xx_i2c.c, multibus_v2 seems to deal mainly with the API
>> stuff
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=blobdiff;f=drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c;h=993b995d34a298d07fbd11bce23f2d0cfdebb40f;hp=1a4c8c9ad2701b550fc1ad0ab2a9fde741902080;hb=899dbf9fbd089a9e8133026be3817e0116f44390;hpb=24d3d6307e1e5d5cddddee399a15e70ef9da8818
> 
> Yep, I adapt this driver only for working with this new API.
> 
>> while the main part of this patch is to replace all hard coded registers
>> by the ability to switch to an other bus.
>>
>> I will send an updated patch with fixing at least the review comments,
>> soon.

Hmm, do you like to push

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-November/063658.html

to I2C git main branch then?

Or are you fine that we push it to u-boot-ti?

Or?

Thanks

Dirk

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-05  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-01  1:52 [U-Boot] Better I2C support for OMAP Tom Rix
2009-11-01  1:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add I2C multibus support for OMAP2/3 boards Tom Rix
2009-11-01  8:24   ` Dirk Behme
2009-11-01 12:43     ` Tom
2009-11-01 17:09       ` Tom
2009-11-02  7:28     ` Heiko Schocher
2009-11-02 19:32       ` Dirk Behme
2009-11-05  6:25         ` Heiko Schocher
2009-11-05  6:35           ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-11-05  6:50             ` Heiko Schocher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF2722E.3090901@googlemail.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox