[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[Nick Thompson]

Add initial support for DA8xx SoC's and the spectrum digital DA830 EVM board.

See:
	http://www.ti.com
	http://www.spectrumdigital.com/

DA8xx is similar to DaVinci devices, but has a differing memory map and
updated peripherals. It is intended that DaVinci drivers will be modified in
some way to support these differences.

A side effect of this is that there are some legacy code constructs in this
patch set that are required to utilize the DaVinci drivers as they stand now.
For example there are some volatiles and memory pointer types defined that are
no longer considered acceptable.

The new code in this patch set doesn't use these constructs and the remaining
artefacts can be removed when the DaVinci drivers stop using them.

This patch set is based on code originally from TI.
---
Changes from previous patch set:

#defines of constant variables to lower case
load registers only as required in clk_get()

This patch set depends on "[PATCH V3] Davinci: add a pin multiplexer
    configuration API" posted on 2009-11-04

Applies to u-boot-ti:

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[Tom]

Nick Thompson wrote:
> Add initial support for DA8xx SoC's and the spectrum digital DA830 EVM board.
> 
> See:
> 	http://www.ti.com
> 	http://www.spectrumdigital.com/
> 
> DA8xx is similar to DaVinci devices, but has a differing memory map and
> updated peripherals. It is intended that DaVinci drivers will be modified in
> some way to support these differences.
> 
> A side effect of this is that there are some legacy code constructs in this
> patch set that are required to utilize the DaVinci drivers as they stand now.
> For example there are some volatiles and memory pointer types defined that are
> no longer considered acceptable.
> 
> The new code in this patch set doesn't use these constructs and the remaining
> artefacts can be removed when the DaVinci drivers stop using them.
> 
> This patch set is based on code originally from TI.
> ---
> Changes from previous patch set:
> 
> #defines of constant variables to lower case
> load registers only as required in clk_get()
> 


> This patch set depends on "[PATCH V3] Davinci: add a pin multiplexer
>     configuration API" posted on 2009-11-04

Yes it is dependent.
There is a compile error without the pin mux function.

Once the pin multiplex patch is ack-ed then
Ack to this patch set.

Thanks
Tom


> 
> Applies to u-boot-ti:
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[Nick Thompson]

On 12/11/09 02:58, Tom wrote:
> Nick Thompson wrote:
>> Add initial support for DA8xx SoC's and the spectrum digital DA830 EVM board.

>> This patch set depends on "[PATCH V3] Davinci: add a pin multiplexer
>>     configuration API" posted on 2009-11-04
> 
> Yes it is dependent.
> There is a compile error without the pin mux function.
> 
> Once the pin multiplex patch is ack-ed then
> Ack to this patch set.
> 
> Thanks
> Tom

I've submitted an update for the pinmux functions, based on your comments.

Thanks for the Ack,
Nick.

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[Tom]

Nick Thompson wrote:
> On 12/11/09 02:58, Tom wrote:
>> Nick Thompson wrote:
>>> Add initial support for DA8xx SoC's and the spectrum digital DA830 EVM board.
> 
>>> This patch set depends on "[PATCH V3] Davinci: add a pin multiplexer
>>>     configuration API" posted on 2009-11-04
>> Yes it is dependent.
>> There is a compile error without the pin mux function.
>>
>> Once the pin multiplex patch is ack-ed then
>> Ack to this patch set.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tom
> 
> I've submitted an update for the pinmux functions, based on your comments.
> 
Yes. Your changes are fine.

Sandeep,
Can you push this the pinmux and then this change to the arm-ti ?

Tom

> Thanks for the Ack,
> Nick.

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom [mailto:Tom.Rix at windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:42 AM
> To: Nick Thompson; Paulraj, Sandeep
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5 0/4] add TI DA8xx support:
> 
> Nick Thompson wrote:
> > On 12/11/09 02:58, Tom wrote:
> >> Nick Thompson wrote:
> >>> Add initial support for DA8xx SoC's and the spectrum digital DA830 EVM
> board.
> >
> >>> This patch set depends on "[PATCH V3] Davinci: add a pin multiplexer
> >>>     configuration API" posted on 2009-11-04
> >> Yes it is dependent.
> >> There is a compile error without the pin mux function.
> >>
> >> Once the pin multiplex patch is ack-ed then
> >> Ack to this patch set.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Tom
> >
> > I've submitted an update for the pinmux functions, based on your
> comments.
> >
> Yes. Your changes are fine.
> 
> Sandeep,
> Can you push this the pinmux and then this change to the arm-ti ?
> 
> Tom

Will do it this weekend.

> 
> > Thanks for the Ack,
> > Nick.
>