From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:34:39 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] ARM: fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function declared weak In-Reply-To: <20091105223850.0D21B3F6EC@gemini.denx.de> References: <1257292804-10612-1-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <1257292804-10612-2-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <1257292804-10612-3-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <20091105201959.43CD93F6EC@gemini.denx.de> <4AF33815.4030101@windriver.com> <20091105223850.0D21B3F6EC@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4AF9C04F.1020509@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <4AF33815.4030101@windriver.com> you wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye >>> What is this? Are you sure this patch is properly attributed? Was >>> Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye really the first to submit this patch? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Wolfgang Denk >>> >> Would you like the older one ? >> As you said, they looked the same. > > It does not matter what I like. What matters is who is to be credited > for this patch, and in my opinion this has to be the first to submit > it. > > You don't get any credits any more today for inventing a light bulb, > either. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > I have pushed the earlier patch to arm/next. Tom Author: Ron Lee Date: Wed Aug 5 20:14:01 2009 +0200 ARM Don't inline weak symbols ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GCC 4.4 complains about this now. Signed-off-by: Ron Lee