* [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros?
@ 2009-11-17 8:06 Robert P. J. Day
2009-11-17 8:41 ` Dirk Behme
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-11-17 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
i asked about this on the beagleboard list but i figure i can ask
here as well. while the beagleboard is based on the OMAP3530, if you
check out board/ti/beagle:
$ grep OMAP3 *
beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_OMAP3_BEAGLE;
beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_boot_params = (OMAP34XX_SDRC_CS0 + 0x100);
beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio5_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO5_BASE;
beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio6_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO6_BASE;
beagle.h: "OMAP3 Beagle board",
config.mk:# Beagle Board uses OMAP3 (ARM-CortexA8) cpu
$
as in, note the references to OMAP34XX macros, not OMAP35XX. and
that's because, in include/configs/omap3_beagle.h, all of the
references seem to be to OMAP34XX, such as:
/*
* High Level Configuration Options
*/
#define CONFIG_ARMCORTEXA8 1 /* This is an ARM V7 CPU core */
#define CONFIG_OMAP 1 /* in a TI OMAP core */
#define CONFIG_OMAP34XX 1 /* which is a 34XX */
#define CONFIG_OMAP3430 1 /* which is in a 3430 */
#define CONFIG_OMAP3_BEAGLE 1 /* working with BEAGLE */
almost all of the macros under include/asm/arch-omap3 are defined in
terms of OMAP34XX as well and while that may work fine for now, is
there any chance that could cause conflicts down the road?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros?
2009-11-17 8:06 [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2009-11-17 8:41 ` Dirk Behme
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2009-11-17 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i asked about this on the beagleboard list but i figure i can ask
> here as well. while the beagleboard is based on the OMAP3530, if you
> check out board/ti/beagle:
>
> $ grep OMAP3 *
> beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_OMAP3_BEAGLE;
> beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_boot_params = (OMAP34XX_SDRC_CS0 + 0x100);
> beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio5_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO5_BASE;
> beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio6_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO6_BASE;
> beagle.h: "OMAP3 Beagle board",
> config.mk:# Beagle Board uses OMAP3 (ARM-CortexA8) cpu
> $
>
> as in, note the references to OMAP34XX macros, not OMAP35XX. and
> that's because, in include/configs/omap3_beagle.h, all of the
> references seem to be to OMAP34XX, such as:
>
> /*
> * High Level Configuration Options
> */
> #define CONFIG_ARMCORTEXA8 1 /* This is an ARM V7 CPU core */
> #define CONFIG_OMAP 1 /* in a TI OMAP core */
> #define CONFIG_OMAP34XX 1 /* which is a 34XX */
> #define CONFIG_OMAP3430 1 /* which is in a 3430 */
> #define CONFIG_OMAP3_BEAGLE 1 /* working with BEAGLE */
>
> almost all of the macros under include/asm/arch-omap3 are defined in
> terms of OMAP34XX as well and while that may work fine for now, is
> there any chance that could cause conflicts down the road?
Due to cross-posting answered at Beagle mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/browse_thread/thread/5813bff4b4d420c7
Dirk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-17 8:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-17 8:06 [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros? Robert P. J. Day
2009-11-17 8:41 ` Dirk Behme
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox