From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:49:03 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Extended soft_i2c driver for AT91SAM9263 SoC In-Reply-To: <20091122201444.AA13EE34A27@gemini.denx.de> References: <1242645655326-git-send-email-Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu> <20091122201444.AA13EE34A27@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4B0A3E6F.5070509@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1242645655326-git-send-email-Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> While hard_i2c support is not available >> (see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049751.html), >> this patch enables soft_i2c on AT91SAM9263 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> --- >> drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c >> index 59883a5..9a48783 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c >> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9263 /* only valid for AT91SAM9263 */ >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_IXP425 /* only valid for IXP425 */ >> #include >> #endif >> -- > > Is there a specific reason this was not applied yet? No, just seems I missed it :-( I apply it ASAP to i2c-next. bye Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany