[U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.

[Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>]

On 17.12.2009 16:58, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de
>> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:25 PM
>> To: Dirk Behme
>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Subject: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re:
>> [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.
>>
>> Dirk Behme wrote:
>>> On 17.12.2009 14:29, Sriramakrishnan wrote:
>>>> Increase the bootargs string length as multiple options
>>>> (especially for Video settings) are passed to the kernel
>>>> through bootargs. Also increase the number of args.
>>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Should we do this for some more OMAP3 boards, too? E.g. Overo and
>>> Beagle? Or for all OMAP3 boards?
>>>
>>
>> It seems like a lot of the omap3 boards share common config options.
>> What do you think about consolidating the common options to
>> a sub config file ?
>
> Seems a good idea; only if we are sure that the next board doesn't
> break the current list of common configs. Else, we would be having
> patches to move config options back to board specific files.

Does Wolfgang have a basic opinion about sub-configs for configuration 
stuff common for similar boards?

Best regards

Dirk