From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:54:19 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Add support for EP93XX SoCs In-Reply-To: <20100117171354.GA16182@darwin> References: <20091223192601.GK32054@darwin> <4B532C00.3080303@windriver.com> <20100117171354.GA16182@darwin> Message-ID: <4B534ECB.10001@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > hi tom, > > thanks for your review! > > El Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:25:52AM -0600 Tom ha dit: > >> Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: >>> Add support for the Cirrus EP93XX platform >>> >>> create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/arch-ep93xx/ep93xx.h >> There are build errors that cut this review short. >> The review of this patch is fairly complete. >> I will review the others on the next revision. >> >> For the ep93xx boards, I saw this error on MAKEALL and building normally >> >> src/u-boot-arm/drivers/net/ep93xx.c:513: undefined reference to `unlikely' >> drivers/net/libnet.a(ep93xx.o): In function `ep93xx_miiphy_write' > > i forgot that i have an additional patch in my tree that fixes this > issue > > as it isn't related with ep93xx in any way i sent it separately: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-December/065779.html > I verified that unlikely/likely are defined in linux/compiler.h As recommended by Mike F. > what is the right way to solve this dependency on a patch that isn't > in mainline yet? add it to the patch set though it isn't ep93xx > related? > I see your point. That change would likely fix this issue. Include this fix in your next revision if it hasn't been accepted into the mainline. I will not be able to ack it but at least it would not hold up the review. The ack-ing would be done, i believe, by the flash-nand custodian, Scott W or Wolfgang. Tom