From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:40:19 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH ARM] Update the s3c2410 nand driver from linux-2.6.31.5 In-Reply-To: <20100118201639.GA6490@loki.buserror.net> References: <4AF29290.3060708@fearnside-systems.co.uk> <20100118201639.GA6490@loki.buserror.net> Message-ID: <4B556FF3.5080100@fearnside-systems.co.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 08:53:36AM +0000, kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote: >> This patch updates the s3c2410 nand driver from that of linux 2.6.31.5, >> modified to make it work in the u-boot mtd nand architecture and to allow >> setting the flash timing parameters from a board config file instead of >> being hard coded. Note that this modified driver supports s3c2410 and >> s3c2440. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt >> --- >> >> checkpatch.pl shows no errors or warnings, and MAKEALL ARM9 shows no new >> errors or warnings. >> >> Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II Board with local s3c2440 patches as I don't >> have an s3c2410 board. >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410_nand.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++-------------- >> include/asm-arm/arch-s3c24x0/s3c2410.h | 25 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > It looks like this got missed, probably because it either depended on > something in (or destined for) the ARM tree, or I just assumed that because > of the "PATCH ARM". > > Unfortunately, it doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Could you resend, if it's > still needed? It was part of adding s3c2440 support which I've had to re-work quite a lot and is currently waiting for comments on a set of re-worked patches. I think it would be simpler if I dropped this one and submitted a replacement later on. I think the s3c2410 nand driver code is different in the u-boot main, Samsung SOC, and NAND repositories though so I'm not sure what I should base a future patch on given that Wolfgang asked me to always base patches on u-boot master. > > -Scott >