From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Scharsig <js_at_ng@scharsoft.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:00:31 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures
In-Reply-To: <4B53561B.9040104@windriver.com>
References: <4B522170.5060901@scharsoft.de> <4B534D7A.8030804@scharsoft.de>
	<4B53561B.9040104@windriver.com>
Message-ID: <4B5AD6CF.6070407@scharsoft.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello Tom,
> By bisectable, i mean that early patches do not depend on later patches.
> It should be possible to just apply patch 1 without applying any of
> the other patch.
> 
> Patch 1 looks like is contains the union of all the config file changes.
> What it should have contained was only 1 change adding CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY.
> Fixing this will mean separating this changes into their logical parts
> and rebasing the patchset to include then in the correct order.
> This is a task best done as you develop instead of after the fact.  This is
> why i recommended that it may be easier to break this patchset into multiple
> pieces and submit them separately.
> 

I have fully restructured the patch. I will send this as V3 within the
next hour.
The Parts are now only depended from 9 to 1, but independed from 1 to 9. 


regards

Jens