From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:02:17 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Merge Window closed, waiting for pull requests In-Reply-To: <1687fa361002050105xd1fc860v331100c73de4770@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100119223037.E185BF38A7F@gemini.denx.de> <4B57410C.2090403@googlemail.com> <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D98313B3E@dlee01.ent.ti.com> <4B6B0C48.90207@googlemail.com> <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D98980C46@dlee01.ent.ti.com> <1687fa361002050105xd1fc860v331100c73de4770@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B6C32F9.2060106@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dirk Behme wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: >> >>> On 20.01.2010 18:58, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: >>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Merge Window closed, waiting for pull >>>>> requests >>>>> >>>>> On 19.01.2010 23:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> as you probably have noticed, the merge window closed about 24 hours >>>>>> ago. Checking my list, I still see s _long_ list of ARM related >>>>>> patches that have not been processed yet. For many of them I haven't >>>>>> seen any review comments, nor have architecture maintainer picked >>>>>> these up and sent pull requests to Tom. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you please try and work on this now, so that we can have the >>>>>> outstanding patches integrated into mainline in the next few days? >>>>> I'd like to see the Beagle rev C4 patches applied: >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066629.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066632.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066634.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066636.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066638.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066640.html >>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066642.html >>>>> >>>>> (The ml archive seems to have some issues with these patches. In my >>>>> inbox they seem to be fine, though) >>>> Same with me but when I discussed offline with Tom, it appears as if >>> this set never made it to his Inbox. >>>> We need just a little more time. >>> What's the recent status of this? >> Tom had comments. > > Do you (or anybody else) mind to send the archive links of the > comments? Just to be sure that everything will be covered and nothing > is missed ;) > > Many thanks and best regards > > Dirk The big ones I remember are copyrights, documenting magic video settings, clk tweeking needs to move to board level. These weren't all of them, please see my full comments on 1/23 Tom