From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Gorsulowski <Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:12:25 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
In-Reply-To: <4B759857.6070001@windriver.com>
References: <4B5AD772.9080406@scharsoft.de>	<4B69EE86.5090201@scharsoft.de>	<4B6D7A6F.7040403@windriver.com>	<4B72997A.9070701@esd.eu>
	<4B740C78.40500@windriver.com>	<4B74F99F.3080400@esd.eu>
	<4B759857.6070001@windriver.com>
Message-ID: <4B768919.9020601@esd.eu>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Tom wrote:
> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>> Tom wrote:
>>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>>>> Hello Tom,
>>>>
>>>> Tom wrote:
>>>>> Jens Scharsig wrote:
>>>>>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
>>>>>>  This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
>>>>>>  to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated
>>>>>>  SoC is used.
...
>> You probably recognized that I did not sent a patch with CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
>> support but I updated the otc570 board to new SoC access.
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067691.html
>> I guess, this is the best solution.
>>
> 
> Daniel,
> I still see an error wrt otc570.
> 
> Jens,
> I have pushed your patchset of around 2/4 to arm/master.
> 
> There will be an error in the otc570 build.
> Tom
> 

If you are talking about errors in clock.c, I know about them.
Please take a look at the comments in my otc570 patch. Regarding to Jens
patchset I wrote:

> Apart from a tiny change, I give them an ACK. See
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067674.html
> and
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067680.html

Best regards
Daniel Gorsulowski