From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:13:34 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 rev2] ep93xx: Refactoring of timer code
In-Reply-To: <20100225181528.GA3628@darwin>
References: <7ee75976e78e2f82b4163fe1ff4233a850d4393c.1266966938.git.matthias@kaehlcke.net>
	<20100223232209.GR20201@darwin>
	<4B869D53.1040207@windriver.com> <20100225181528.GA3628@darwin>
Message-ID: <4B87122E.4040309@windriver.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> El Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:54:59AM -0600 Tom ha dit:
> 
>> Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> ep93xx: Refactoring of the timer code, including the following changes
>>>
>>> * use a free running timer instead of a periodical one
>>> * use unsigned long long for total number of ticks
>>> * hold the timer state in a structure instead of separate variables
>>> * increment the timer counter instead of decrementing it
>>> * remove unused function udelay_masked()
>>> * remove unused function set_timer()
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net>
>> This set has been applied to ARM.
> 
> i was/am working on a new version of the patch, taking into account
> your remarks about the unit of TIMER_FREQ and fixing some issues
> discussed with Alessandro Rubini off-list, who worked on a similar
> patch.
> 
> what do you prefer, a patch based on the ones you just applied, or
> revert them and get one with all fixes (only one patch, cause
> the function clk_to_systicks() fixed in the first patch of the set is
> removed)
> 
> i apologize for not having taken the time to notify about this and
> causing you overhead :(
> 
Its ok with me if you just rebase and submit a smaller patch.
Tom