From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:07:34 -0800
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] i.MX / Freescale ARM custodian needed
In-Reply-To: <4B8D49BB.5070102@denx.de>
References: <20100205141317.CEB7312E33A5@gemini.denx.de>	
	<4B6C31A8.6050202@windriver.com>	
	<4b73d43f1002050815w32b685e1g563870e841cd49b3@mail.gmail.com>	
	<4B8D2413.7070703@denx.de>
	<20100302145006.AF827E44CE6@gemini.denx.de>
	<4b73d43f1003020806j662b86dco5ceb200e3cdc0870@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B8D49BB.5070102@denx.de>
Message-ID: <4B8D53E6.9030402@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 3/2/2010 9:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> John Rigby wrote:
>    
>> I think Ben was ok with my mx25 changes, but needed an arm person to do
>> the commit.
>>
>>      
> Hi John,
>
> yes, I think I have read Ben's comment on your patch. However, because
> your patch does not apply anymore on TOT, I am asking who is responsible
> to merge the driver (you, Ben or I), or if this job was already done.
>
> Sorry, I sent a wrong link in the previous e-mail. The problem arises
> with your patch
> "fec_mxc: cleanup and factor out MX27 dependencies", that contains
> changes in both the fec_mxc driver and the imx tree:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/067075.html
>
> Now I am supposing I am the person to apply your patch, at least for the
> u-boot-imx. Not sure how to proceed with the network driver. What do you
> think ? Is it ok if I merge the driver ? Or do you prefer to check
> yourself ? Ben, what do you think ?
>
>    
Please go ahead.
> Regards,
> Stefano
>
>    
regards,
Ben