From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:14:28 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] AT91: Update otc570 board to new SoC access In-Reply-To: <4B910C4F.5020404@esd.eu> References: <1265896624844-git-send-email-Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu> <4B910C4F.5020404@esd.eu> Message-ID: <4B9111C4.1000904@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > Hello Tom > > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access >> * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> --- >> This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset. >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067424.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067425.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067426.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067427.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067428.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067429.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067430.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067431.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067432.html >> > ... > > I recognized, you didn't apply this patch yet. Is there any reason, or did you > simply slip this patch? > > Btw. I'm also missing this patch: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067779.html > Yes. This was slipped. I spent some time trying to work out which patches needed to be applied to remove the build errors I was seeing with otc but was unable to. Please send me the list of patches and oder of application. Tom > Best regards, > Daniel Gorsulowski