From: Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Fix compile errors for atmel_nand with hw-ecc and new SoC access
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:26:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB8BDCC.6030603@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269780145-6396-3-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de>
Alexander Holler wrote:
> atmel_nand.c with HW-ECC doesn't compile with the new SoC access.
> Using CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to circumvent the compile errors only leaves
> the driver in a state where it doesn't find the NAND.
>
> To use HW-ECC with atmel_nand one has to use
> CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECC_BASE AT91_ECC0_BASE (instead of AT91_ECC0)
> for an AT91SAM9263 or AT91_ECC_BASE for an AT91SAM9260.
>
Nak
The new Soc access is the preferred method.
The fix should use the Soc access, not the legacy method.
Tom
> I've removed three unused variables too.
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index d5eb54a..5f10a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@
>
> /* Register access macros */
> #define ecc_readl(add, reg) \
> - readl(AT91_BASE_SYS + add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
> + readl(add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
> #define ecc_writel(add, reg, value) \
> - writel((value), AT91_BASE_SYS + add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
> + writel((value), add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
>
> #include "atmel_nand_ecc.h" /* Hardware ECC registers */
>
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout atmel_oobinfo_small = {
> static int atmel_nand_calculate(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> const u_char *dat, unsigned char *ecc_code)
> {
> - struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
> unsigned int ecc_value;
>
> /* get the first 2 ECC bytes */
> @@ -167,7 +166,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_correct(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
> u_char *read_ecc, u_char *isnull)
> {
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
> - unsigned int ecc_status, ecc_parity, ecc_mode;
> + unsigned int ecc_status;
> unsigned int ecc_word, ecc_bit;
>
> /* get the status from the Status Register */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-04 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 6:55 [U-Boot] [PATH] at91: add hwecc method for nand Nikolay Petukhov
2010-03-18 22:46 ` Scott Wood
2010-03-19 5:49 ` Nikolay Petukhov
2010-03-19 22:17 ` Scott Wood
2010-03-28 12:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] atmel_nand with HW-ECC Alexander Holler
2010-03-28 12:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Add AT91_ECC_BASE to at91sam9260.h to use " Alexander Holler
2010-03-28 12:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Fix compile errors for atmel_nand with hw-ecc and new SoC access Alexander Holler
2010-04-02 16:38 ` Scott Wood
2010-04-03 11:08 ` Alexander Holler
2010-04-03 11:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Add AT91_ECC_BASE to at91sam9260.h to use atmel_nand with HW-ECC Alexander Holler
2010-04-03 11:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Fix compile errors for atmel_nand with hw-ecc and new SoC access Alexander Holler
2010-04-04 16:26 ` Tom [this message]
2010-04-04 17:26 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB8BDCC.6030603@windriver.com \
--to=tom.rix@windriver.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox