From: Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Patch submission process
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:29:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB9601C.2070904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB8BB93.5040006@windriver.com>
Hello Tom,
>>> In message <4BB45F3D.8040804@st.com> you wrote:
>>>> After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
>>>> can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
>>>> continuously sent and reviewed.
>>>>
>>>> Is it correct to assume that a patch can be sent at any time and will
>>>> only be applied to the mainline code during the merging window
>>> First, please keep in mind that there are different types of patches.
>>>
>>> - There are bug fixes that correct problems in the existing code.
>>> These can go in moe or less any time. In reality, it depends on how
>>> urgent the problem is and how intrusive the bug fix is. Urgent
>>> fixes and low-intrusive patches go in more easily - for example, if
>>> a bug breaks support for a number of boards it makes no sense to
>>> continue with the release process without adding this patch - it is
>>> the urgency here that counts. On the other hand, if a patch fixes a
>>> spelling error in one of the README files, it is NOT urgent, but
>>> may go in quickly anyway, because it is obvious that applying this
>>> change has no impact on other parts of the code. Compare a patch
>>> that fixxes a bug that gets triggered under certain conditions
>>> only, but that requiires heavy vchanges to a lot of files - such a
>>> patch will go in early in the release process, but not if we are
>>> approaching the scheduled release date.
>
> If the patch is a bug fix that should go in a release,
> please let me know.
>
No, it was just for clarification mainly.
Thanks for your inputs
>>>
>>> - There are patches that add new features and/or support for new
>>> boards and processors. Such patches get accepted for mainline only
>>> when the merge window is open. It makes sense to post such patches
>>> before that, to get initial review comments and to have the patches
>>> clean and ready for posting when the merge window opens.
>>>
>>> Some custodians even accept patches before that, and add these for
>>> example to their respective "next" branches. This is mostly a matter
>>> of the personal style of working of the respective custodian.
>
> I will take patches or pull requests at any time.
> Usually they go to arm/master.
> Outside of the merge window they go arm/next.
>
OK
> Tom
>
>
Regards
Vipin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-01 8:54 [U-Boot] Patch submission process Vipin KUMAR
2010-04-01 9:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-01 11:38 ` Vipin KUMAR
2010-04-04 16:17 ` Tom
2010-04-05 3:59 ` Vipin KUMAR [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB9601C.2070904@st.com \
--to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox