public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Patch submission process
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:29:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB9601C.2070904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB8BB93.5040006@windriver.com>

Hello Tom,

>>> In message <4BB45F3D.8040804@st.com> you wrote:
>>>> After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
>>>> can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
>>>> continuously sent and reviewed.
>>>>
>>>> Is it correct to assume that a patch can be sent at any time and will
>>>> only be applied to the mainline code during the merging window
>>> First, please keep in mind that there are different types of patches.
>>>
>>> - There are bug fixes that correct problems in the existing code.
>>>   These can go in moe or less any time. In reality, it depends on how
>>>   urgent the problem is and how intrusive the bug fix is. Urgent
>>>   fixes and low-intrusive patches go in more easily - for example, if
>>>   a bug breaks support for a number of boards it makes no sense to
>>>   continue with the release process without adding this patch - it is
>>>   the urgency here that counts. On the other hand, if a patch fixes a
>>>   spelling error in one of the README files, it is NOT urgent, but
>>>   may go in quickly anyway, because it is obvious that applying this
>>>   change has no impact on other parts of the code. Compare a patch
>>>   that fixxes a bug that gets triggered under certain conditions
>>>   only, but that requiires heavy vchanges to a lot of files - such a
>>>   patch will go in early in the release process, but not if we are
>>>   approaching the scheduled release date.
> 
> If the patch is a bug fix that should go in a release,
> please let me know.
> 

No, it was just for clarification mainly.
Thanks for your inputs

>>>
>>> - There are patches that add new features and/or support for new
>>>   boards and processors. Such patches get accepted for mainline only
>>>   when the merge window is open. It makes sense to post such patches
>>>   before that, to get initial review comments and to have the patches
>>>   clean and ready for posting when the merge window opens.
>>>
>>>   Some custodians even accept patches before that, and add these for
>>>   example to their respective "next" branches. This is mostly a matter
>>>   of the personal style of working of the respective custodian.
> 
> I will take patches or pull requests at any time.
> Usually they go to arm/master.
> Outside of the merge window they go arm/next.
> 

OK

> Tom
> 
> 

Regards
Vipin

      reply	other threads:[~2010-04-05  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-01  8:54 [U-Boot] Patch submission process Vipin KUMAR
2010-04-01  9:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-01 11:38   ` Vipin KUMAR
2010-04-04 16:17     ` Tom
2010-04-05  3:59       ` Vipin KUMAR [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BB9601C.2070904@st.com \
    --to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox