[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: add defines for RTT and GPBR

[Tom <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>]

Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 03.04.2010 20:36, schrieb Tom:
>> Alexander Holler wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
>>> ---
>>> include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h | 2 ++
>>> include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9261.h | 2 ++
>>> include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9263.h | 3 +++
>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Ack
>> This change is fine.
>> Please include this with the changes to the rtc driver in patch 2/2
>> In general, include all the patches in a patchset when you make a change
>> to any one of them.
> 
> This two patches are unrelated. This patch just makes incomplete headers 
> more complete. If something else would use those two defines and anyone 
> would revert the patch for rtc-driver the revert would eleminate the 
> defines too.
> 

Patch 2/2 depends on patch 1/2.

 From 2/2

+#define gpbr_readl() \
+	readl(AT91_GPBR_BASE + 4 * CONFIG_RTC_AT91SAM9_GPBR)
+#define gpbr_writel(val) \
+	writel((val), AT91_GPBR_BASE + 4 * CONFIG_RTC_AT91SAM9_GPBR)

 From 1/2

--- a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@
  #define AT91_PIO_BASE		0xfffff400
  #define AT91_PMC_BASE		0xfffffc00
  #define AT91_RSTC_BASE		0xfffffd00
+#define AT91_RTT_BASE		0xfffffd20
  #define AT91_PIT_BASE		0xfffffd30
  #define AT91_WDT_BASE		0xfffffd40
+#define AT91_GPR_BASE		0xfffffd50

 From inspection, at least some boards would have an error if 1/2 was
not applied before 2/2.

1/2 is ok by itself.
I will go ahead and apply this patch.

Thanks
Tom