From: Richard Retanubun <RichardRetanubun@RuggedCom.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Moving i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:22:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF6266.8040508@RuggedCom.com> (raw)
Hi Heiko,
I am trying to do something similar to what you did in this commit:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=commit;h=39df00d9aecfb465b9eec9af593f9b763fb5209a
and I have a question, must i2c_board_init for fsl_i2c.c be called before
the actual controller initialization? (i.e. setting the bus speed and the controller's slave address)
if we call it at the end of i2c_init, we can take advantage of the setups done before, no?
Most of the other implementation does it in the beginning because they can change the
i2c pins to GPIO and 'bit-bang' the reset pattern, and then change it back to i2c pins.
The alternative is of course to assume nothing in i2c_board_init, and configure everything
(I kinda liked to use set_i2c_bus_speed, rather than hardcoding something).
Since the kmeter1 board is the only user of i2c_board_init in fsl_i2c.c, would you be
opposed if I submit a patch that moves the call for i2c_board_init to the end of i2c_init?
Or, can I make another 'callpoint' (e.g. i2c_reset_bus) and call that at the end?
Thanks for your time.
- Richard Retanubun
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 17:22 Richard Retanubun [this message]
2010-04-12 6:11 ` [U-Boot] Moving i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations Heiko Schocher
2010-04-12 18:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Move " richardretanubun at ruggedcom.com
2010-04-12 18:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-12 18:22 ` Richard Retanubun
2010-04-12 18:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-12 19:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Add i2c_board_late_init richardretanubun at ruggedcom.com
2010-04-12 19:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-14 7:02 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-04-14 15:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3]fsl_i2c: " richardretanubun at ruggedcom.com
2010-04-12 19:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2]fsl_i2c: " richardretanubun at ruggedcom.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBF6266.8040508@RuggedCom.com \
--to=richardretanubun@ruggedcom.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox