From: Nick Thompson <nick.thompson@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Davinci: SPI performance enhancements
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C207474.5090904@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DA214C1C-1C6A-4654-8778-DF6959AEE699@audioscience.com>
On 21/06/10 19:38, Delio Brignoli wrote:
> Hello Nick,
>
> On 21/06/2010, at 11:27, Nick Thompson wrote:
>> The following restructuring and optimisations increase the SPI
>> read performance from 1.3MiB/s (on da850) to 2.87MiB/s (on da830):
>
> Using this patch I get 2.21MiB/s on my L138 EVM (da850), quite
> an improvement! I would like to see how much my original patch can
> be improved using some of your changes without splitting the code
> to handle the three cases. I will try later this week.
Not testing the txp and rxp pointers in the loop was a significant
gain for me and pipe-lining the TX and RX operations is going to be
a little trickier, but give it a go by all means.
>
> [...]
>> + if (!dout)
>> + return davinci_spi_read(slave, len, din, flags);
>> + else if (!din)
>> + return davinci_spi_write(slave, len, dout, flags);
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPI_HALF_DUPLEX
>> + else
>> + return davinci_spi_read_write(slave, len, din, dout, flags);
>> +#endif
>
> I think there should always be an else branch at the end even if
> CONFIG_SPI_HALF_DUPLEX is not defined. Something like:
>
> #else
> flags |= SPI_XFER_END;
> #endif
Hmmm, yes, you are correct. That must be added, else in the unexpected
case, the transaction will be opened and left open. I'll fix that.
>
> to terminate the transfer instead of failing silently.
> In fact it should signal the error condition somehow, but
> I do not know enough about u-boot to provide an advice on this.
I think maybe a printk(KERN_ERR ...) will do it. I'll add that too.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Delio
Thanks for the review.
Nick.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 9:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Davinci: SPI performance enhancements Nick Thompson
2010-06-21 14:41 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2010-06-21 14:57 ` Nick Thompson
2010-06-21 15:21 ` Nick Thompson
2010-06-21 18:38 ` Delio Brignoli
2010-06-22 8:29 ` Nick Thompson [this message]
2010-06-22 9:57 ` Delio Brignoli
2010-06-22 14:27 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2010-06-22 14:40 ` Delio Brignoli
2010-06-22 15:27 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2010-06-23 8:14 ` Nick Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C207474.5090904@ge.com \
--to=nick.thompson@ge.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox