[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Rupesh Gujare]

Hi Sandeep,

    Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards?
 I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me if I
am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches.

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071434.html
[2] git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git



-- 
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

Hi Sandeep,

    Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards?
 I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me if I am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches.

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071434.html
[2] git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git<http://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git>



Rupesh,

I am not supposed to add these to u-boot-ti.

These should go through u-boot-mmc.

There again since its been quite a while since this patch was sent to the list, i'll add this to u-boot-ti.

Thanks,
Sandeep

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Rupesh Gujare]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep <s-paulraj@ti.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
>
>
>     Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards?
>
>  I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me if
> I am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches.
>
>
>
> [1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071434.html
>
> [2] git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rupesh,
>
>
>
> I am not supposed to add these to u-boot-ti.
>
>
>
> These should go through u-boot-mmc.
>
>
>
> There again since its been quite a while since this patch was sent to the
> list, i?ll add this to u-boot-ti.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sandeep
>
>
>
>
>
Sandeep,

  Sorry, I was not aware that these patches should go through u-boot-mmc.

and Thanks for adding these patches to u-boot-ti git tree, as it will help
community around davinci boards.



-- 
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

Hi Sandeep,

    Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards?
 I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me if I am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches.

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071434.html
[2] git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git<http://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git>



--
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare

Some time back there was an OMAP MMC patch which was ACKED but not applied.

So I went ahead and added it to u-boot-ti.

I had some days back agreed to take the DaVinci driver into u-boot ti but when
I had a look at this entire set of patches for DaVinci MMC support, I realized that
It is a set of some 9 patches. This not only adds davinci specific stuff but also modifies MMC and
ARM lib code.

Further more it seems from the post below

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071498.html

that it was supposed to be applied to u-boot-mmc but in reality was not really applied making this case
synonymous to OMAP MMC patch where the patch was ACKED but not really applied.


The best course of action would be to respin the patches(against u-boot-ti) and send it to the list after a round of testing.

We can then discuss how to go about adding this to u-boot if nobody objects or adds comments.

To be frank adding most of this code is not under my "jurisdiction" and will probably get sent back by Wolfgang even if I add it to
u-boot-ti.


Regards,
Sandeep

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Alagu Sankar]

Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards?
>
> I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me 
> if I am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches.
>
> [1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071434.html
>
> [2] git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git <http://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Rupesh Gujare
>
> Some time back there was an OMAP MMC patch which was ACKED but not 
> applied.
>
> So I went ahead and added it to u-boot-ti.
>
> I had some days back agreed to take the DaVinci driver into u-boot ti 
> but when
>
> I had a look at this entire set of patches for DaVinci MMC support, I 
> realized that
>
> It is a set of some 9 patches. This not only adds davinci specific 
> stuff but also modifies MMC and
>
> ARM lib code.
>
> Further more it seems from the post below
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071498.html
>
> that it was supposed to be applied to u-boot-mmc but in reality was 
> not really applied making this case
>
> synonymous to OMAP MMC patch where the patch was ACKED but not really 
> applied.
>
> The best course of action would be to respin the patches(against 
> u-boot-ti) and send it to the list after a round of testing.
>
> We can then discuss how to go about adding this to u-boot if nobody 
> objects or adds comments.
>
> To be frank adding most of this code is not under my ?jurisdiction? 
> and will probably get sent back by Wolfgang even if I add it to
>
> u-boot-ti.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sandeep
>
Hi Sandeep,

The patches can be applied as a standalone davinci patch, independent of 
the other common MMC add-ons. Thats why we have around 9 patches. Let me 
know if you would like us to regenerate the patch in a different format. 
We can make the changes, test it and submit again.

Best Regards,
Alagu Sankar

[U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

> > --
> > Regards,
> > Rupesh Gujare
> >
> > Some time back there was an OMAP MMC patch which was ACKED but not
> > applied.
> >
> > So I went ahead and added it to u-boot-ti.
> >
> > I had some days back agreed to take the DaVinci driver into u-boot ti
> > but when
> >
> > I had a look at this entire set of patches for DaVinci MMC support, I
> > realized that
> >
> > It is a set of some 9 patches. This not only adds davinci specific
> > stuff but also modifies MMC and
> >
> > ARM lib code.
> >
> > Further more it seems from the post below
> >
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-May/071498.html
> >
> > that it was supposed to be applied to u-boot-mmc but in reality was
> > not really applied making this case
> >
> > synonymous to OMAP MMC patch where the patch was ACKED but not really
> > applied.
> >
> > The best course of action would be to respin the patches(against
> > u-boot-ti) and send it to the list after a round of testing.
> >
> > We can then discuss how to go about adding this to u-boot if nobody
> > objects or adds comments.
> >
> > To be frank adding most of this code is not under my "jurisdiction"
> > and will probably get sent back by Wolfgang even if I add it to
> >
> > u-boot-ti.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sandeep
> >
> Hi Sandeep,
> 
> The patches can be applied as a standalone davinci patch, independent of
> the other common MMC add-ons. Thats why we have around 9 patches. Let me
> know if you would like us to regenerate the patch in a different format.
> We can make the changes, test it and submit again.

Just submit the entire series again to the list.

Sandeep