public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Thompson <nick.thompson@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 17/19] arm cp15: setup mmu and enable dcache
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:57:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C52A1FD.3050105@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C529C40.6090002@denx.de>

On 30/07/10 10:32, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Nick Thompson wrote:
>> On 29/07/10 11:45, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> +	     i++) {
>>> +		page_table[i] = i << 20 | (3 << 10) | 0x1e;
>>
>> These numbers ought to be defines, no?
>>
>> The 0x1e will not work on da8xx as the data cache is broken. The d-cache can
>> still be used in write back mode, so the value 0x1a should be used. It would

Here, I should have said write-thru' can still be used...

>> be good to have symbols to define the caching modes: none, wr-thru', wr-back
>> or some such, similar to Linux.
> 
> Ah, Ok, good hint!
> 
> What with:
> 
> if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_ARM_CACHE_SETUP)
> #define CONFIG_SYS_ARM_CACHE_SETUP	0x1e
> #endif
> 
> 		page_table[i] = i << 20 | (3 << 10) | CONFIG_SYS_ARM_CACHE_SETUP;
> 
> So boards/architectures can define there own values?

How about:

#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_ARM_CACHE_WRITETHROUGH)
#define CACHE_SETUP	0x1a
#else
#define CACHE_SETUP	0x1e
#endif

		page_table[i] = i << 20 | (3 << 10) | CACHE_SETUP;

This would avoid people having to look up the appropriate value(s).

This follows the Linux model, but there the symbol CPU_CACHE_WRITETHROUGH
is used. Ideally, I would suggest we use the CPU form as well, but it
would imply an effect beyond ARM.

--
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-30  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-29 10:45 [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 17/19] arm cp15: setup mmu and enable dcache Heiko Schocher
2010-07-30  9:11 ` Nick Thompson
2010-07-30  9:31   ` Alessandro Rubini
2010-07-30  9:32   ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-30  9:57     ` Nick Thompson [this message]
2010-07-30 10:13       ` Heiko Schocher
2010-08-03 10:16   ` [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v2 " Heiko Schocher
2010-08-05 18:22     ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-06  5:29       ` Heiko Schocher
2010-08-06 15:41         ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-06 15:46           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-06 16:14             ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-06 16:27               ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-06 16:32                 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-06 16:44                   ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-10 17:45                     ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-11  5:56                       ` Heiko Schocher
2010-08-11 13:31                         ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-11 13:53                           ` Ben Gardiner
2010-08-11 17:06                             ` Heiko Schocher
2010-08-11 19:56                             ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C52A1FD.3050105@ge.com \
    --to=nick.thompson@ge.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox