From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= <eric@eukrea.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:03:03 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ??
In-Reply-To: <4C5A80E1.9050504@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <4C50E124.2000807@emk-elektronik.de>	<201007290018.40886.vapier@gentoo.org>	<20100803212858.B8D1C28F@gemini.denx.de>
	<4C5A80E1.9050504@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4C5AA877.3060602@eukrea.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Reinhard,

Le 05/08/2010 11:14, Reinhard Meyer a ?crit :
> Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
>> Reinhard, do you volunteer?  For AVR32?  Or also for AT91?
> that would be a possibility. However I was more thinking in the way, that
> since there are practically no other contributors right now that Wolfgang
> would take my patches directly to mainstream unless someone protests them
> in due time.
>
> Apparently no one is testing them on other AT91 boards (are there any except
> for Atmel's EKs?); no one critisizes any coding issues :). Naturally those
> patches work on the AT91SAM9XE-EK (which I use as a substitute as long as
> our own hardware is not available - mid-August now). After that, I can still
> test on both.
>
I sent patches to update our cpuat91 board 3 times, so you are not the 
only one trying to get patches merged for AT9 :-).

If needed, I also can help you for AT91 (I have board using : 
at91rm9200, at91sam9260 and at91sam9g20).

Eric